Doris Walker, et al v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
| DORIS V. WALKER and WALKEREALTY LLC |
| BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and LIENHUB, doing business as Grant Street Group, Inc. |
| 24-1471 |
| March 28, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Personal Injury |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: Appellant Ms. Doris V. Walker shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7373045] Jurisdictional memorandum due for Appellant Doris V. Walker by 04/12/2024. DW [3] [7373045] [24-1471] (ER) [Entered: 03/29/2024 11:41 AM]
|
|
Filing 2
Order issued A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7372738] DW [2] [7372738] [24-1471] (ER) [Entered: 03/28/2024 11:43 AM]
|
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellants Doris V. Walker and Walkerealty LLC by 04/02/2024. Transcript information sheet due by 04/11/2024. Fee or IFP forms due on 04/11/2024 for Appellants Doris V. Walker and Walkerealty LLC. [1] [7372721] [24-1471] (ER) [Entered: 03/28/2024 11:31 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
