Lonnial Roundtree, Jr. v. Jeelan Muhammad, et al
LONNIAL L. ROUNDTREE, JR. |
JEELAN MUHAMMAD, SUSAN SHEBEL, VELINDA LLORENS, KEVIN SIMS, Doctor and MARIA TORRES |
24-1496 |
April 1, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [3] [7373331] (Note: The Office of the IL Attorney General has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [24-1496] (CG) [Entered: 04/01/2024 12:06 PM] |
Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Ms. Meyers, Ms. Sheldon, Mr. Hughes, Cermak Health Services of Cook County, Sergeant Franzo, Mr. Davis, Thomas J. Dart, County of Cook, Ms. Mitchell, John Doe and Jane Doe. [2] [7373330] [24-1496] (CG) [Entered: 04/01/2024 12:05 PM] |
Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Lonnial L. Roundtree Jr. by 04/04/2024. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 05/01/2024. Transcript information sheet due by 04/15/2024. [1] [7373326] [24-1496] (CG) [Entered: 04/01/2024 11:54 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.