Franshon Stapleton v. USA
Petitioner: FRANSHON STAPLETON, also known as SHON, also known as BIG SHON, also known as BIRD, also known as BIG BIRD, also known a B.O.N., also known as CHRIS, also known as FRANSOHN STAPLETON
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 24-1501
Filed: April 2, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 14, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Appellant Franshon Stapleton is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Franshon Stapleton by 05/28/2024. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7022 0410 0003 3396 2376. [6] [7382135] [24-1501] (AD) [Entered: 05/14/2024 09:32 AM]
April 22, 2024 Filing 5 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Franshon Stapleton leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 04/10/2024. [5] [7377683] [24-1361, 24-1501] (AP) [Entered: 04/22/2024 10:31 AM]
April 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Appellant Franshon Stapleton is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Franshon Stapleton by 04/30/2024. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7022 041 0003 3396 1911. [4] [7376507] [24-1501] (AD) [Entered: 04/16/2024 10:06 AM]
April 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER issued TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [3] [7374905] [24-1361, 24-1501] (CG) [Entered: 04/08/2024 04:49 PM]
April 8, 2024 Filing 2 Prose motion filed by Appellant Franshon Stapleton in 24-1361, 24-1501 to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [2] [7374853] [24-1361, 24-1501] (CAH) [Entered: 04/08/2024 04:02 PM]
April 4, 2024 Terminated Attorney Katherine Virginia Boyle and added Attorney Jeffrey Kienstra as lead counsel of record for Appellee USA in case 24-1501. [7374084-2] [7374084] [24-1501] (JR) [Entered: 04/04/2024 09:30 AM]
April 1, 2024 Filing 1 Federal prisoner's 2255 case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 01/11/2024. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 04/16/2024. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Franshon Stapleton by 04/08/2024. Fee or IFP forms due on 04/16/2024 for Appellant Franshon Stapleton. [1] [7373664] [24-1501] (AD) [Entered: 04/02/2024 01:59 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Franshon Stapleton v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: FRANSHON STAPLETON, also known as SHON, also known as BIG SHON, also known as BIRD, also known as BIG BIRD, also known a B.O.N., also known as CHRIS, also known as FRANSOHN STAPLETON
Represented By: Franshon Stapleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Katherine Virginia Boyle
Represented By: Jeffrey Kienstra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?