Stanley Boclair v. Jacqueline Lashbrook, et al
| STANLEY BOCLAIR |
| JACQUELINE LASHBROOK, JOHN R. BALDWIN, BARRY MYERS, MICHAEL LAMINACK and PHILIP ROYSTER |
| 24-1539 |
| April 5, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Terminated Attorney Nadine J. Wichern and added Attorney Frank Henry Bieszczat as lead counsel of record for State Defendants-Appellees in cases 24-1463, 24-1465, 24-1505, 24-1506, 24-1539, 24-1547, 24-1556, 24-1618, and 24-1675. [7378613-2] [7378613] [24-1463, 24-1465, 24-1505, 24-1506, 24-1539, 24-1547, 24-1556, 24-1618, 24-1675] (JR) [Entered: 04/25/2024 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Joshua Cornstubble; John Koch; Justin Engelage; Carson Winters; Ezra Hunter. [2] [7374694] [24-1539] (FP) [Entered: 04/08/2024 10:17 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 04/19/2024. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Stanley Boclair by 04/12/2024. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 05/06/2024. [1] [7374691] [24-1539] (FP) [Entered: 04/08/2024 10:08 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
