Bernard Mims v. City of Chicago, et al
BERNARD MIMS |
CITY OF CHICAGO, KENNETH BOUDREAU, RICHARD PECK, ROBERT MONTGOMERY and DANIEL MCNALLY |
24-1564 |
April 9, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Appearance form filed by Attorney Ethan Merel for Appellees City of Chicago, Kenneth Boudreau, Daniel McNally, Robert Montgomery and Richard Peck. Additional Parties: Ted Przepiora and Michael McDermott. [7] [7375627] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [24-1564] [Edited 04/11/2024 by CG to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Merel, Ethan) [Entered: 04/11/2024 01:17 PM] |
Filing 6 ORDER: Appellant and appellees shall file, on or before April 25, 2024, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be remanded to the district court to enter a proper and complete Rule 58 judgment. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) JXK [7375561] [6] [7375561] [24-1564] (PS) [Entered: 04/11/2024 11:04 AM] |
Filing 5 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Jon Loevy for Appellant Bernard Mims. [5] [7375467] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [24-1564] (Loevy, Jon) [Entered: 04/10/2024 04:43 PM] |
Filing 4 Appearance form filed by Attorney SUZANNE M. LOOSE for Appellees Kenneth Boudreau, City of Chicago, Daniel McNally, Robert Montgomery and Richard Peck. Additional Parties: Ted Przepiora, Michael McDermott, and Raymond Kaminski. [4] [7375278] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [24-1564] [Edited 04/10/2024 by CG to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Loose, Suzanne) [Entered: 04/10/2024 11:09 AM] |
Filing 3 ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7375229] [3] [7375229] [24-1564] (HTP) [Entered: 04/10/2024 09:44 AM] |
Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Ted Przepiora, Michael McDermott, and Raymond Kaminski. [2] [7375228] [24-1564] (HTP) [Entered: 04/10/2024 09:42 AM] |
Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Bernard Mims by 04/15/2024. Transcript information sheet due by 04/23/2024. Appellant's brief due on or before 05/20/2024 for Bernard Mims. [1] [7375224] [24-1564] (HTP) [Entered: 04/10/2024 09:39 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.