LaShawn Russell v. Darron Hyte
| LASHAWN L. RUSSELL |
| DARRON HYTE, Warden |
| 24-1572 |
| April 10, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 03/14/2024. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant LaShawn L. Russell by 04/16/2024. Transcript information sheet due by 04/24/2024. [1] [7375365] [24-1572] (MAN) [Entered: 04/10/2024 02:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: LaShawn Russell v. Darron Hyte | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: LASHAWN L. RUSSELL | |
| Represented By: | LaShawn L. Russell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: DARRON HYTE, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Katherine M. Doersch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
