Leonardo McCray v. Greg Donathan, et al
| LEONARDO MCCRAY |
| GREG DONATHAN, ERIN POSEY, SANDRA HAM, CODY D. WATERKOTTE and CHARLES LAEGELER |
| 24-1656 |
| April 22, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions-Cv Detainee |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders these appeals are CONSOLIDATED for purposes of briefing and disposition. These cases will proceed to a determination of appellants fee status on appeal. See Roberts v. United States Dist. Ct. for N. Dist. of California, 339 U.S. 844, 845 (1950). JXK [4] [7377900] [24-1656, 24-1657] (MAN) [Entered: 04/22/2024 04:19 PM]
|
| Filing 3 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [3] [7377774] (Note: The Office of the IL Attorney General has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [24-1656] (ER) [Entered: 04/22/2024 12:41 PM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Behavior Committee, Schuyler County, Paul Vincent, Mark Vincent and Ashaly Gregory. [2] [7377772] [24-1656] (ER) [Entered: 04/22/2024 12:39 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Leonardo McCray by 04/29/2024. Transcript information sheet due by 05/06/2024. Fee or IFP forms due on 05/06/2024 for Appellant Leonardo McCray. [1] [7377767] [24-1656] (ER) [Entered: 04/22/2024 12:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
