Roberto Lopez v. Lizzie Tegels
| ROBERTO I. LOPEZ |
| LIZZIE TEGELS, Warden |
| 24-1672 |
| April 23, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability pending. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Roberto I. Lopez by 04/29/2024. Fee or IFP forms due on 05/07/2024 for Appellant Roberto I. Lopez. Transcript information sheet due by 05/07/2024. [1] [7378095] [24-1672] (MAN) [Entered: 04/23/2024 12:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Roberto Lopez v. Lizzie Tegels | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ROBERTO I. LOPEZ | |
| Represented By: | Roberto I. Lopez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: LIZZIE TEGELS, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Wisconsin Department of Justice - Habeas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
