USA v. Christopher Emery
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| CHRISTOPHER D. EMERY |
| 24-1805 |
| May 9, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Christopher D. Emery. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [8] [7382878] [24-1805] (Green, Terry) [Entered: 05/16/2024 03:58 PM] |
Filing 7
ORDER issued TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [7] [7382845] [24-1805] (CG) [Entered: 05/16/2024 03:28 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Motion filed by Appellant Christopher D. Emery to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [6] [7382827] [24-1805] (Green, Terry) [Entered: 05/16/2024 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed status report and transcript information sheet by Appellant Christopher D. Emery. [5] [7382807] [24-1805] (Green, Terry) [Entered: 05/16/2024 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Christopher D. Emery. [4] [7382786] [24-1805] (CG) [Entered: 05/16/2024 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 3 Appearance form filed by Attorney Thomas E. Leggans for Appellee USA. [3] [7381776] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [24-1805] [Edited 05/13/2024 by ER - terminated Attorney James A. Cutchin and added Attorney Thomas E. Leggans. ] (Leggans, Thomas) [Entered: 05/13/2024 09:42 AM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Although the defendant was represented by counsel in the district court, the defendant (or the clerk of the district court on the defendants behalf) filed a notice of appeal pro se in this criminal action. Counsel is reminded of the obligation to represent the defendant on appeal unless specifically relieved by this court upon a motion to withdraw. See Circuit Rule 51(a) and (c). Counsel shall comply with the provisions of Fed. R. App. P. 10(b) regarding the preparation of the transcripts. Counsel must file, no later than May 16, 2024, a Status Report regarding their compliance with this order. Attorney Terry M. Green is advised that a copy of the Transcript Information Sheet submitted to the court reporter must be attached to the Status Report, signed by the court reporter and indicating the date the transcripts are expected to be completed. DW [2] [7381552] [24-1805] (CG) [Entered: 05/10/2024 10:50 AM]
|
| Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Christopher D. Emery by 05/16/2024. Fee or IFP forms due on 05/23/2024 for Appellant Christopher D. Emery. Transcript information sheet due by 05/23/2024. [1] [7381544] [24-1805] (CG) [Entered: 05/10/2024 10:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Christopher Emery | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Thomas E. Leggans |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CHRISTOPHER D. EMERY | |
| Represented By: | Terry M. Green Esq. |
| Represented By: | Christopher D. Emery |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
