Nikita Biddle, et al v. City of Chicago, et al
| NIKITA BIDDLE and CHIQUITA BIDDLE |
| MCDONALD'S CORPORATION, UNKNOWN MCDONALD'S EMPLOYEES, UNKNOWN POLICE DEPARTMENTS, CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT and CITY OF CHICAGO |
| 24-2049 |
| June 20, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellees' briefs. [ # 15 ] Appellees' briefs due on or before 10/03/2024 for City of Chicago and McDonald's Corporation. Appellants' reply brief, if any, is due on or before 10/24/2024 for Appellants Chiquita Biddle and Nikita Biddle. CDH [16] [7399854] [24-2049] (CG) [Entered: 08/16/2024 12:06 PM]
|
| Filing 15 Motion filed by Appellee McDonald's Corporation to extend time to file appellee brief. [15] [7399693] [24-2049] (Fulco, Stacy) [Entered: 08/15/2024 04:10 PM] |
| Filing 14 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Richard J. Zito for Appellee McDonald's Corporation. [14] [7398440] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [24-2049] (Fulco, Stacy) [Entered: 08/09/2024 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 13 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Stacy D. Fulco for Appellee McDonald's Corporation. [13] [7398439] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [24-2049]--[Edited 08/09/2024 by FP to reflect that atty. Fulco and Zito are added to the docket.] (Fulco, Stacy) [Entered: 08/09/2024 10:17 AM] |
| Filing 12 Appearance form filed by Attorney David B. Smith for Appellee City of Chicago. [12] [7398175] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [24-2049] [12] [7398175] [24-2049]--[Edited 08/08/2024 by HTP to reflect addition of counsel.] (Smith, David) [Entered: 08/08/2024 09:33 AM] |
| Filing 11 10 copies Appellant's brief filed by Appellants Chiquita Biddle and Nikita Biddle. Appellee's brief due on or before 08/30/2024 for City of Chicago and McDonald's Corporation. REMINDER: If a case is designated to proceed to oral argument, hearing notices will be mailed shortly before the date of oral argument. Please note that counsel's unavailability for oral argument must be submitted by letter, filed electronically with the Clerk's Office, and should be made by no later than seven days after the filing of the appellee's brief. See Cir. R. 34(b)(3), (4). The court's calendar is located at https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/cal/argcalendar.pdf. Once scheduled, oral argument is rescheduled only in extraordinary circumstances. See Cir. R. 34(b)(4), (e). [11] [7396790] [24-2049]--[Edited 07/31/2024 by CAH to reflect correct appellee parties] (EF) [Entered: 07/31/2024 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney Brett J. Swanson for Appellee McDonald's Corporation has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [10] [7395493] [24-2049] (LJ) [Entered: 07/24/2024 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 9 Appearance form filed by Attorney Julian N. Henriques, Jr. for Appellee City of Chicago. [9] [7393948] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [24-2049] [9] [7393948] [24-2049]--[Edited 07/16/2024 by HTP to reflect addition of counsel.] (Henriques, Julian) [Entered: 07/16/2024 04:42 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed status report by Appellee City of Chicago. [8] [7392037] [24-2049] (Loose, Suzanne) [Entered: 07/08/2024 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 7 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Nikita Biddle. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [7] [7390990] [24-2049] (CAH) [Entered: 07/01/2024 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 6 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Chiquita Biddle. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [6] [7390987] [24-2049] (CAH) [Entered: 07/01/2024 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 5 Appearance form filed by Attorney SUZANNE M. LOOSE for Appellee City of Chicago. [5] [7389897] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [24-2049]--[Edited 06/25/2024 by PS - to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Loose, Suzanne) [Entered: 06/25/2024 02:07 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: A preliminary review of the short record indicates that the district court has not entered a Rule 58 judgment. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that both appellants and appellees shall file, on or before July 8, 2024, a statement advising the court whether they will request in the district court that judgment be set out in a separate document. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(d). JXK [4] [7389061] [24-2049] (ER) [Entered: 06/20/2024 02:58 PM]
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7388991] JXK [3] [7388991] [24-2049] (CG) [Entered: 06/20/2024 12:07 PM]
|
| Filing 2 No attorney(s) added for Appellees Chicago Police Department, Unknown McDonald's Employees and Unknown Police Departments, per District Court docket. [2] [7388988] [24-2049] (CG) [Entered: 06/20/2024 12:05 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellants Chiquita Biddle and Nikita Biddle by 06/25/2024. Transcript information sheet due by 07/05/2024. Appellant's brief due on or before 07/30/2024 for Chiquita Biddle and Nikita Biddle. [1] [7388975] [24-2049] (CG) [Entered: 06/20/2024 11:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
