USA v. Jason Compliment
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| JASON COMPLIMENT |
| 24-2243 |
| July 22, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Jason Compliment. [6] [7395771] [24-2243] (Franzen, Jodie) [Entered: 07/25/2024 02:45 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER: Kenneth Lawrence Riggins, DEVRIES LAW OFFICE, 1512 N. Delaware Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, [email protected], is appointed to represent defendant-appellant Jason Compliment pursuant to the provisions of the Criminal Justice Act. Counsel is directed to contact the defendant-appellant immediately. Briefing shall proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 09/03/2024 for Jason Compliment. Appellee's brief due on or before 10/03/2024 for United States of America. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 10/24/2024 for Appellant Jason Compliment. Finally, the District Court shall add attorney Kenneth Lawrence Riggins to their CM/ECF database for purposes of accessing District Court documents, including sealed docket entries not filed ex parte. DW [5] [7395679] [24-2243] (AD) [Entered: 07/25/2024 11:28 AM]
|
| Filing 4 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Jason Compliment. [4] [7395098] [24-2243] (Riggins, Kenneth) [Entered: 07/23/2024 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Jason Compliment. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [3] [7394897] [24-2243] (Riggins, Kenneth) [Entered: 07/22/2024 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed District Court order. Mr. Compliment's motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, dkt. [104], is DENIED as unnecessary. Mr. Compliment had appointed counsel in the district court and IFP status is therefore automatically authorized on appeal. See 18 U.S.C. 3006A(d)(7) ("If a person for whom counsel is appointed under this section appeals to an appellate court or petitions for a writ of certiorari, he may do so without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor and without filing the affidavit required by section 1915(a) of title 28."); United States v. Kosic, 944 F.3d 448, 450 (2d Cir. 2019) ("[I]f a criminal defendant was appointed CJA counsel in the district court, then IFP status is automatically authorized on appeal."). [2] [7394886] [24-2243] (AP) [Entered: 07/22/2024 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Jason Compliment by 07/23/2024. Appellant's brief due on or before 09/03/2024 for Jason Compliment. Transcript information sheet due by 08/05/2024. [1] [7394876] [24-2243] (AP) [Entered: 07/22/2024 03:04 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Jason Compliment | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JASON COMPLIMENT | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth Lawrence Riggins Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Bradley A. Blackington |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
