Lucien McArthur v. Leonta Jackson, et al
| LUCIEN S. MCARTHUR |
| LEONTA JACKSON, Warden, ANITA BUNCE, Nurse, SABRINA FOX, Nurse, ELAINE SMITH, JOHN OVERFELT, Nurse and DAVID HANSON, Nurse |
| 24-2323 |
| July 31, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: check in the amount of $5.00. The clerk of this court shall send the CHECK to the clerk of the district court. [4] [7399972] CC [24-2323] (DAB) [Entered: 08/16/2024 04:23 PM]
|
| Filing 3 Filed letter from Appellant Lucien S. McArthur. (CH sent application for IFP 08/09/2024). [3] [7398561] [24-2323] (CAH) [Entered: 08/09/2024 03:37 PM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Patricia Swisher; Ashley Kinsella, f/k/a Ashley Vinson; Kim Williams; [2] [7396971] [24-2323] (FP) [Entered: 08/01/2024 11:34 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Transcript information sheet due by 08/14/2024. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Lucien S. McArthur by 08/05/2024. [1] [7396955] [24-2323] (FP) [Entered: 08/01/2024 11:01 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
