Stanley Boclair v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
| STANLEY BOCLAIR |
| DAVID L. EVELSIZER, ROB JEFFREYS, Acting Director, ROBERT MUELLER, Southern Regional Director, REVA ENGALAGE, CMT Nurse, LLOYD HANNA, Dietary Manager and FRANK LAWRENCE, Former Warden |
| 24-2406 |
| August 14, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER re: Motion to correct the record, filed on 9/3/2024. This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore the filing of a notice of appeal triggers the obligation to pay the appropriate filing fees and voluntary dismissal does not relieve the appellant of the obligation to pay the appellate filing fees. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b). Further, a review of the district court docket shows that the appellant filed different notices of appeal on August 12, 2024, and on August 13, 2024. Accordingly, to the extent that the appellant seeks to withdraw his second appeal, the motion is DENIED without prejudice to renewal. Should the appellant decide that he does not want to proceed with this appeal, he may file a renewed motion that complies with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). Any such motion is due by October 7, 2024. If the appellant does not file a compliant motion to voluntarily dismiss, this appeal will proceed to a ruling on his motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed on September 3, 2024. The clerk shall send the appellant a copy of the courts public docket for appeal no. 24-2397 and 24-2406. [ # 8 ] [9] [7403856] CDH [24-2406] (FP) [Entered: 09/05/2024 04:28 PM]
|
| Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Stanley Boclair to correct record. [8] [7403777] [24-2406] (DAB) [Entered: 09/05/2024 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Stanley Boclair for review of certification. [7] [7403775] [24-2406] (DAB) [Entered: 09/05/2024 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Stanley Boclair Memorandum In Support of PLRA Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis. [6] [7403774] [24-2406] (DAB) [Entered: 09/05/2024 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 5 Prose motion filed by Appellant Stanley Boclair to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [5] [7403773] [24-2406] (DAB) [Entered: 09/05/2024 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Stanley Boclair. [4] [7402384] [24-2406] (AD) [Entered: 08/29/2024 11:35 AM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Appellant Stanley Boclair is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Stanley Boclair by 09/12/2024. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7020 3160 0001 5911 9528. [3] [7402380] [24-2406] (AD) [Entered: 08/29/2024 11:30 AM]
|
| Filing 2 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Stanley Boclair in 24-2397, 24-2406 leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 08/14/2024. [2] [7400058] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 09/18/2024. [24-2397, 24-2406] (CAG) [Entered: 08/19/2024 10:33 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 08/28/2024. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Stanley Boclair by 08/20/2024. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 09/13/2024. [1] [7399385] [24-2406] (AD) [Entered: 08/14/2024 03:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
