John Rodriguez v. Martin O'Malley
| JOHN RODRIGUEZ |
| MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security |
| 24-2460 |
| August 22, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| S.S.I.D. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER: This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [12] [7409127] [24-2460] (AD) [Entered: 10/03/2024 10:22 AM]
|
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 10/03/2024 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7409145-2] [7409145] [24-2460] (AD) [Entered: 10/03/2024 11:03 AM] |
| Filing 11 Filed notice of courtesy copy of a motion pending before the District Court by Appellant John Rodriguez. [11] [7407618] [24-2460] (CAG) [Entered: 09/25/2024 02:25 PM] |
Filing 10
ORDER: In light of the district courts September 19, 2024, order dismissing this case, this appeal will proceed to a determination of appellants fee status. JXK [7407366] [24-2460] (CG) [Entered: 09/24/2024 03:25 PM]
|
Filing 9
ORDER re: Motion to directly appeal to the United States Supreme Court. To the extent that the appellant seeks to appeal to the United States Supreme Court, the appellant is reminded that any petition for writ of certiorari should be filed with the United States Supreme Court and in accordance with the Supreme Court's rules. Accordingly, the court will take no action on the appellant's filing. CDH [9] [7406280] [24-2460] (AP) [Entered: 09/18/2024 02:27 PM]
|
| Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant John Rodriguez to directly appeal to the United States Supreme Court. [8] [7406097] [24-2460] (CAH) [Entered: 09/17/2024 03:55 PM] |
Filing 7
ORDER re: Motion of Plaintiff-Appellant for Clarification and Re-Confirmation. To the extent that the appellant needs additional time to comply with Circuit Rule 3(b), the appellant shall either pay the $605.00 appellate filing fees or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the district court by September 25, 2024. The clerk shall send the appellant a copy of the courts public docket. [ # 6 ] CDH [7] [7404816] [24-2460] (AD) [Entered: 09/11/2024 01:19 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant John Rodriguez for clarification and reconfirmation. [6] [7404022] [24-2460] (EF) [Entered: 09/06/2024 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 5 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant John Rodriguez. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [5] [7404020] [24-2460] (EF) [Entered: 09/06/2024 11:48 AM] |
Filing 4
ORDER: Appellant John Rodriguez is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant John Rodriguez by 09/19/2024. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7020 3160 0001 5911 9870. [4] [7403674] [24-2460] (AD) [Entered: 09/05/2024 10:50 AM]
|
Filing 3
ORDER: A preliminary review of the short record indicates that the order appealed from may not be a final appealable judgment within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. 1291. Although the district court entered final judgment on April 25, 2024, appellant then filed a timely motion for reconsideration on May 21, 2024. The district court granted that motion (in part) on June 25, 2024, vacated the judgment, and directed appellant to file a renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis and an amended complaint. This appeal appears to be premature because the district court has not yet entered a new final judgment disposing of all claims against all parties. See Alonzi v. Budget Construction Co., 55 F.3d 331, 333 (7th Cir. 1995); Cleaver v. Elias, 852 F.2d 266, 267 (7th Cir. 1988). Nor has the district court suggested that the case would be dismissed if appellant failed to tender the required motion and amended complaint before the deadline. Cf. Davis v. Advoc. Health Ctr. Patient Care Exp., 523 F.3d 681, 683 (7th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that appellant shall file, on or before September 9, 2024, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7401532] JXK [3] [7401532] [24-2460] (AP) [Entered: 08/26/2024 11:41 AM]
|
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7401031] (Note: The Office of the US Attorney has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [24-2460] (CG) [Entered: 08/22/2024 12:19 PM] |
| Filing 1 U.S. civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant John Rodriguez by 08/28/2024. Fee or IFP forms due on or before 09/05/2024 for Appellant John Rodriguez. Appellant's brief due on or before 10/01/2024 for John Rodriguez. Transcript information sheet due by 09/05/2024. [1] [7401020] [24-2460]--[Text updated 08/26/2024 by JR to reflect the proper fee due deadline.] (CG) [Entered: 08/22/2024 11:59 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: John Rodriguez v. Martin O'Malley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JOHN RODRIGUEZ | |
| Represented By: | John Rodriguez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.