Stefannie Dyson v. Steven Klimek, et al
Plaintiff: STEFANNIE DYSON
Defendant: MICHAEL LUCENTE, Director, STEVEN KLIMEK, Lieutenant, ROXANE BOUTTE, Superintendent, LONNIE HOLLIS, Director, W. JOHNSON and BRIAN SHULTZ
Case Number: 24-2502
Filed: August 29, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2024 Filing 14 Filed Response by Appellees Roxane Boutte, Lonnie Hollis, Steven Klimek and Michael Lucente to Appellant's Jurisdictional Memorandum. [14][7412342] [24-2502] (Kummerer, Mark) [Entered: 10/18/2024 04:51 PM]
October 18, 2024 Filing 13 Added Attorney(s) Mark Sullivan Kummerer for party(s) Appellee Michael Lucente Appellee Steven Klimek Appellee Roxane Boutte Appellee Lonnie Hollis, in case 24-2502 per appearance form. Appearance form filed by Attorney Mark Kummerer for Appellees Lonnie Hollis, Steven Klimek, Michael Lucente and Roxane Boutte. [13] [7412166] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [24-2502]--[Edited 10/18/2024 by AD to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Kummerer, Mark) [Entered: 10/18/2024 11:57 AM]
October 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER re: Jurisdictional Memorandum. IT IS ORDERED that appellees shall file, on or before October 21, 2024, a response to appellants jurisdictional memorandum, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of October 1, 2024. JXK [12] [7410716] [24-2502] (AP) [Entered: 10/10/2024 02:53 PM]
October 10, 2024 Filing 11 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Stefannie Dyson. [11] [7410635] [24-2502] (DAB) [Entered: 10/10/2024 10:59 AM]
October 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: Appellant shall file, on or before October 15, 2024, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal under Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure will satisfy this requirement. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details). [7408715] JXK [10] [7408715] [24-2502] (HTP) [Entered: 10/01/2024 02:45 PM]
September 30, 2024 Filing 9 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Stefannie Dyson leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 09/30/2024. [9] [7408478] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 10/30/2024. [24-2502] (CAG) [Entered: 09/30/2024 04:10 PM]
September 30, 2024 Filing 8 Filed Certification in lieu of financial statement by Appellant Stefannie Dyson. [8][7408344] [24-2502] (DAB) [Entered: 09/30/2024 01:10 PM]
September 30, 2024 Filing 7 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Stefannie Dyson. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [7] [7408342] [24-2502] (DAB) [Entered: 09/30/2024 01:04 PM]
September 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER re: Motion for leave to file interlocutory appeal. [6] This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket indicates that the appellants fee status has not yet been determined. Specifically, on September 6, 2024, the district court denied the appellants motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis without prejudice. To the extent that the appellant seeks to correct the docket, the clerk shall modify the docket to reflect that Brian Shultz and W. Johnson are appellees to this appeal. The appellant shall file her overdue Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement by October 3, 2024. Any other relief requested in the appellants motion is DENIED without court action, pursuant to this courts fee notice and order dated August 29, 2024. [7406407] CDH [24-2502] (CG) [Entered: 09/19/2024 10:42 AM]
September 19, 2024 Filing 5 Filed district court order dated 09/06/2024, Plaintiff's motion for permission to appeal in forma pauperis denied without prejudice. [5] [7406376] [24-2502] (CAG) [Entered: 09/19/2024 09:37 AM]
September 18, 2024 Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Stefannie Dyson for leave to file interlocutory appeal. [4] [7406200] [24-2502] (EF) [Entered: 09/18/2024 11:07 AM]
September 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. [3] [7404031] JR [24-2502] (CG) [Entered: 09/06/2024 12:05 PM]
September 6, 2024 Filing 2 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Stefannie Dyson to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [2] [7404002] [24-2502] (EF) [Entered: 09/06/2024 11:23 AM]
August 29, 2024 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 09/12/2024. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Stefannie Dyson by 08/29/2024. Fee or IFP forms due on 09/30/2024. [1] [7402555] [24-2502]--[Edited 10/01/2024 by JR to update case type description.] (FP) [Entered: 08/29/2024 04:57 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Stefannie Dyson v. Steven Klimek, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL LUCENTE, Director
Represented By: James W. O'Connor
Represented By: Mark Sullivan Kummerer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STEVEN KLIMEK, Lieutenant
Represented By: James W. O'Connor
Represented By: Mark Sullivan Kummerer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROXANE BOUTTE, Superintendent
Represented By: James W. O'Connor
Represented By: Mark Sullivan Kummerer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LONNIE HOLLIS, Director
Represented By: James W. O'Connor
Represented By: Mark Sullivan Kummerer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: W. JOHNSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRIAN SHULTZ
Represented By: James W. O'Connor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: STEFANNIE DYSON
Represented By: Stefannie Dyson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?