Arthur Jones v. Christine Brannon-Dortch, et al
Plaintiff: ARTHUR JONES
Defendant: JAMAR A. RANGE, RACHEL ENGNELL, CHRISTINE BRANNON-DORTCH, Warden, ROY LITTLE, ROSS FORD and TYLER CROUSE
Case Number: 24-2614
Filed: September 16, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER re: 1. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel. 2. Letter regarding transcript information sheet. [ # 4 ] This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket indicates that the appellant's fee status has not yet been determined. Specifically, the appellants motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is currently pending before the district court. Accordingly, the motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED without court action, pursuant to the courts fee notice and order dated September 16, 2024. To the extent that the appellant seeks leave to use the original record, the appellant is reminded that the district court no longer transmits the record on appeal. Because the record is electronic, it is available for this court's use without the need for transmission of a physical record. Further, should this appeal proceed to briefing, the appellant may make any arguments he believes have merit in his opening brief and he need only attach the judgment or order under review to his opening brief. Cir. R. 30(a). The clerk shall send the appellant a copy of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the local Circuit Rules. [8] [7408939] CDH [24-2614] (CG) [Entered: 10/02/2024 12:11 PM]
September 30, 2024 Filing 7 Records of the case and transcripts filed by Appellant Arthur Jones.[7] [7408476] [24-2614] (CAH) [Entered: 09/30/2024 04:08 PM]
September 30, 2024 Filing 6 Additional transcripts filed by Appellant Arthur Jones.[6] [7408475] [24-2614] (CAH) [Entered: 09/30/2024 04:07 PM]
September 30, 2024 Filing 5 Filed letter from Appellant Arthur Jones regarding transcript information sheet. [5] [7408465] [24-2614] (DAB) [Entered: 09/30/2024 04:03 PM]
September 30, 2024 Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Arthur Jones for appointment of counsel. [4] [7408453] [24-2614] (CAG) [Entered: 09/30/2024 03:57 PM]
September 17, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. [3] [7406063] JR [24-2614] (CG) [Entered: 09/17/2024 02:49 PM]
September 16, 2024 Filing 2 Prose motion filed by Appellant Arthur Jones to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [2] [7406024] [24-2614] (FP) [Entered: 09/17/2024 01:24 PM]
September 16, 2024 Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the Appellate Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 09/30/2024. [1] [7406019] [24-2614] (FP) [Entered: 09/17/2024 01:11 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Arthur Jones v. Christine Brannon-Dortch, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ARTHUR JONES
Represented By: Arthur Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAMAR A. RANGE
Represented By: Frank Henry Bieszczat
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RACHEL ENGNELL
Represented By: Frank Henry Bieszczat
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHRISTINE BRANNON-DORTCH, Warden
Represented By: Frank Henry Bieszczat
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROY LITTLE
Represented By: Frank Henry Bieszczat
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROSS FORD
Represented By: Frank Henry Bieszczat
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TYLER CROUSE
Represented By: Frank Henry Bieszczat
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?