Joshua Scolman v. Daniel La Voie, et al
| JOSHUA JAMES SCOLMAN |
| HANNAH UTTER, LORI JEAN WACHHOLZ, DIANA L. SIMMONS, DANIEL LA VOIE and ASHLEY HASELEU |
| 24-2635 |
| September 19, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Joshua Scolman v Daniel La Voie |
| Joshua Scolman v Daniel La Voie |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Joshua James Scolman. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [10] [7417965] [24-2635] (CAG) [Entered: 11/14/2024 04:00 PM] |
Filing 9
ORDER: Briefing in this appeal is SUSPENDED pending resolution of the motion for appointment of counsel filed by the appellant on November 1, 2024. CDH [9] [7415593] [24-2635] (PS) [Entered: 11/04/2024 01:17 PM]
|
| Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Joshua James Scolman for appointment of counsel. [8] [7415450] [24-2635] (EF) [Entered: 11/01/2024 03:59 PM] |
Filing 7
ORDER: Appellant Joshua James Scolman is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Joshua James Scolman by 11/12/2024. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7020 3160 0001 5911 8439. [7] [7414113] [24-2635] (AD) [Entered: 10/28/2024 01:48 PM]
|
Filing 6
ORDER: The District Court GRANTED appellant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and this court has now received notice from the district court that the appellant paid the initial partial filing fee. Accordingly, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 11/21/2024 for Joshua James Scolman. Appellees' brief due on or before 12/23/2024 for Ashley Haseleu, Daniel La Voie, Diana L. Simmons, Hannah Utter and Lori Jean Wachholz. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 01/13/2025 for Appellant Joshua James Scolman. JXK [6] [7412906] [24-2635] (CG) [Entered: 10/22/2024 12:42 PM]
|
| Filing 5 ***PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT PARTIAL FILING FEE. Received: $51.40 from Appellant Joshua James Scolman on 10/21/2024. [5] [7412718] [24-2635] (CAG) [Entered: 10/22/2024 08:21 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Joshua James Scolman leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 10/01/2024. District Court has assessed a $51.40 initial partial filing fee. [4] [7408608] PLRA initial partial filing fee due by 10/31/2024. [24-2635] (CAG) [Entered: 10/01/2024 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 3 Appearance form filed by Attorney Lynn K. Lodahl for Appellees Ashley Haseleu, Daniel La Voie, Diana L. Simmons, Hannah Utter and Lori Jean Wachholz. [3] [7408594] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [24-2635] [3] [7408594] [24-2635]--[Edited 10/01/2024 by HTP to reflect termination and addition of counsel.] (Lodahl, Lynn) [Entered: 10/01/2024 11:01 AM] |
| Filing 2 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [2] [7408262] [24-2635] (CAG) [Entered: 09/30/2024 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 10/03/2024. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Joshua James Scolman by 09/26/2024. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 10/21/2024. [1] [7406720] [24-2635] (FP) [Entered: 09/20/2024 12:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.