Michael Reck v. Shana Clarkson, et al
| MICHAEL RECK |
| JOHN DOE, Supervisor of 2 House C Wing, JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer, SHANA CLARKSON and ZORIAN TRUSEWYCH |
| 24-2765 |
| October 4, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Michael Reck Memorandum In Support of PLRA Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis. (Forwarded from District Court) [5] [7417049] [24-2765] (EF) [Entered: 11/12/2024 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 4 Prose motion filed by Appellant Michael Reck to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. (Forwarded from District Court) [4] [7417048] [24-2765] (EF) [Entered: 11/12/2024 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Michael Reck leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 10/22/2024. [3] [7412845] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 11/21/2024. [24-2765] (DAB) [Entered: 10/22/2024 11:36 AM] |
| Filing 2 No attorney(s) added for Appellees John Doe and John Doe, per District Court docket. [2] [7409660] [24-2765] (CG) [Entered: 10/07/2024 09:51 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Michael Reck by 10/11/2024. Transcript information sheet due by 10/18/2024. [1] [7409649] [24-2765] (CG) [Entered: 10/07/2024 09:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
