Edward Ash v. City of Aurora, et al
Plaintiff: EDWARD L. ASH
Defendant: SAL CONTRERAS, Officer, JEFF SHERWOOD, Officer, JASON RUSSELL, Officer, GRACIANO FLORES, Officer, MICHAEL CARRASCO, Officer, BRIAN HESTER, Officer and CITY OF AURORA, ILLINOIS
Case Number: 24-2774
Filed: October 7, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 17, 2026 Edward Ash v City of Aurora

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Appellant Edward L. Ash is directed to show cause as to why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to C. R. 31(c)(2). GW. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. Response to Rule to Show Cause due for Appellant Edward L. Ash by 12/17/2024. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589071052700423874483. [7] [7421189] [24-2774] (GW) [Entered: 12/03/2024 11:37 AM]
November 26, 2024 Filing 6 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Edward L. Ash leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 11/26/2024. [6] [7420399] [24-2774] (AP) [Entered: 11/26/2024 03:52 PM]
November 21, 2024 Filing 5 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [5] [7419245] [24-2774] (CG) [Entered: 11/21/2024 09:54 AM]
October 31, 2024 Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Edward L. Ash. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [4] [7415125] [24-2774] (EF) [Entered: 10/31/2024 03:53 PM]
October 23, 2024 Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Christian E. Ketter for Appellees Michael Carrasco, City of Aurora, Illinois, Sal Contreras, Graciano Flores, Jason Russell and Jeff Sherwood. [3] [7413142] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [24-2774]--[Edited 10/23/2024 by PS - to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Ketter, Christian) [Entered: 10/23/2024 10:58 AM]
October 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Appellant Edward L. Ash is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Edward L. Ash by 11/05/2024. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 5270 0423 8733 70. [2] [7412755] [24-2774] (AD) [Entered: 10/22/2024 09:39 AM]
October 7, 2024 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Edward L. Ash by 10/15/2024. Transcript information sheet due by 10/21/2024. Appellant's brief due on or before 11/18/2024 for Edward L. Ash. [1] [7410096] [24-2774] (PS) [Entered: 10/08/2024 12:10 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Edward Ash v. City of Aurora, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAL CONTRERAS, Officer
Represented By: Dominick L. Lanzito
Represented By: Christian E. Ketter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JEFF SHERWOOD, Officer
Represented By: Dominick L. Lanzito
Represented By: Christian E. Ketter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JASON RUSSELL, Officer
Represented By: Dominick L. Lanzito
Represented By: Christian E. Ketter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GRACIANO FLORES, Officer
Represented By: Dominick L. Lanzito
Represented By: Christian E. Ketter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL CARRASCO, Officer
Represented By: Dominick L. Lanzito
Represented By: Christian E. Ketter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRIAN HESTER, Officer
Represented By: Dominick L. Lanzito
Represented By: Christian E. Ketter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF AURORA, ILLINOIS
Represented By: Dominick L. Lanzito
Represented By: Christian E. Ketter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EDWARD L. ASH
Represented By: Edward L. Ash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?