Titus Henderson v. Caleb Zitek, et al
TITUS HENDERSON |
CALEB ZITEK, TRISTAN RETZLAFF, ANTHONY MELI, JOSHUA GOMM and ALEXANDER BONIS |
24-2783 |
October 7, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [4] [7417715] [24-2783] (CAG) [Entered: 11/14/2024 09:31 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Titus Henderson. [3] [7414184] [24-2783] (CAG) [Entered: 10/28/2024 03:45 PM] |
Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: David Yang, Gregory Friedel, John Kind, Drew Weycker, Anthony Matushak, Ryan Baumann, Alejandra Mejia, William Sweikatowski, Jay Van Lanen, Michael Neveu, Alan DeGroot and Andrew Wickman. [2] [7410128] [24-2783] (AD) [Entered: 10/08/2024 02:02 PM] |
Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 10/21/2024. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Titus Henderson by 10/15/2024. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 11/06/2024. [1] [7410127] [24-2783] (AD) [Entered: 10/08/2024 01:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.