Kathleen Hayes v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago, et al
| KATHLEEN HAYES |
| MATTHEW LYONS and BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO |
| 24-2890 |
| October 23, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
|
|
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
Order issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellants' brief. [ # 14 ] Appellants' brief due on or before 01/21/2025 for Board of Education of the City of Chicago and Matthew Lyons. Appellee's brief due on or before 02/20/2025 for Kathleen Hayes. Appellants' reply brief, if any, is due on or before 03/13/2025 for Appellants Board of Education of the City of Chicago and Matthew Lyons. CDH [15] [7422923] [24-2890] (JMB) [Entered: 12/10/2024 04:05 PM]
|
| Filing 14 Motion filed by Appellants Board of Education of the City of Chicago and Matthew Lyons to extend time to file appellant brief. [14] [7422654] [24-2890] (Seyburn, Erica) [Entered: 12/10/2024 08:16 AM] |
Filing 13
ORDER: On consideration of appellants jurisdictional memorandum, this appeal will proceed to briefing. The parties shall address in their briefs whether the Board of Education of the City of Chicago is a proper party to this appeal. Briefing will proceed as follows: Appellants' brief due on or before 12/19/2024 for Board of Education of the City of Chicago and Matthew Lyons. Appellee's brief due on or before 01/21/2025 for Kathleen Hayes. Appellants' reply brief, if any, is due on or before 02/11/2025 for Appellants Board of Education of the City of Chicago and Matthew Lyons. JXK [7418547] [24-2890] (HTP) [Entered: 11/19/2024 08:46 AM]
|
Filing 12
ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. RJS [12] [7416717] [24-2890] (PS) [Entered: 11/08/2024 01:06 PM]
|
| Filing 11 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellants Board of Education of the City of Chicago and Matthew Lyons. [11] [7416558] [24-2890] (Doyle, Thomas) [Entered: 11/08/2024 07:58 AM] |
| Filing 10 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Michael Persoon for Appellee Kathleen Hayes. [10] [7415900] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [24-2890] (Persoon, Michael) [Entered: 11/05/2024 12:16 PM] |
| Filing 9 Added Attorney(s) Thomas H. Geoghegan for party(s) Appellee Kathleen Hayes, in case 24-2890 per disclosure statement. Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Thomas Geoghegan for Appellee Kathleen Hayes. [9] [7415892] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [24-2890]--[Edited 11/05/2024 by AD to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Geoghegan, Thomas) [Entered: 11/05/2024 12:07 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellants' brief due on or before 12/18/2024 for Board of Education of the City of Chicago and Matthew Lyons. Appellee's brief due on or before 01/17/2025 for Kathleen Hayes. Appellants' reply brief, if any, is due on or before 02/07/2025 for Appellants Board of Education of the City of Chicago and Matthew Lyons. RJS [7415491] [24-2890] (FP) [Entered: 11/04/2024 09:24 AM]
|
| Filing 7 Notice of Circuit Rule 33 mediation issued. The mediation will be conducted by phone, Monday, November 18, 2024 at 9:30 a.m. Central Time. See Notice for further details and requirements. RJS. [7] [7415481] [24-2890] (FP) [Entered: 11/04/2024 09:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellants Board of Education of the City of Chicago and Matthew Lyons. [6] [7415196] [24-2890] (Seyburn, Erica) [Entered: 11/01/2024 08:39 AM] |
| Filing 5 Docketing Statement filed by Appellants Board of Education of the City of Chicago and Matthew Lyons. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [5] [7414566] [24-2890] (Seyburn, Erica) [Entered: 10/30/2024 09:10 AM] |
| Filing 4 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Thomas A. Doyle for Appellant Board of Education of the City of Chicago. [4] [7414270] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [24-2890] (Doyle, Thomas) [Entered: 10/29/2024 08:39 AM] |
Filing 3
ORDER: Appellants shall file, on or before November 8, 2024, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction with respect to defendant-appellant the Board of Education of the City of Chicago. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details). [7413699] JXK [3] [7413699] [24-2890] (HTP) [Entered: 10/25/2024 10:26 AM]
|
| Filing 2 Attorney Thomas Arthur Doyle for Matthew Lyons and Board of Education of the City of Chicago in 24-2890 terminated and added Attorney(s) Erica R. Seyburn for party(s) Appellant Matthew Lyons Appellant Board of Education of the City of Chicago, in case 24-2890 per disclosure statement. Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Erica Seyburn for Appellants Board of Education of the City of Chicago and Matthew Lyons. [2] [7413565] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [24-2890]--[Edited 10/25/2024 by AD to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Seyburn, Erica) [Entered: 10/24/2024 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing Statement due for Appellants Board of Education of the City of Chicago and Matthew Lyons by 10/30/2024. Transcript information sheet due by 11/06/2024. Appellants' brief due on or before 12/02/2024 for Board of Education of the City of Chicago and Matthew Lyons. [1] [7413530] [24-2890] (PS) [Entered: 10/24/2024 03:17 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.