USA v. Javan Thompson
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| JAVAN J. THOMPSON |
| 24-2904 |
| October 24, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Elliot Louthen for Appellant Javan J. Thompson. [8] [7422673] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [24-2904] [Edited 12/10/2024 by CG to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Louthen, Elliot) [Entered: 12/10/2024 09:12 AM] |
Filing 7
ORDER: Thomas W. Patton, Chief Federal Defender, 401 Main Street, Peoria, IL, 61602, [email protected], is appointed to represent defendant-appellant Javan J. Thompson. Counsel is directed to contact the defendant-appellant immediately. Further, attorney Bart E. Beals is DISCHARGED as counsel for defendant-appellant Javan J. Thompson. Briefing shall proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 02/18/2025 for Javan J. Thompson. Appellee's brief due on or before 03/20/2025 for United States of America. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 04/10/2025 for Appellant Javan J. Thompson. Finally, the District Court shall add attorney Thomas W. Patton to their CM/ECF database for purposes of accessing District Court documents, including sealed docket entries not filed ex parte. [7] DW [7419090] [24-2904] (FP) [Entered: 11/20/2024 02:59 PM]
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders that briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. DW [6] [7416997] [24-2904] (AD) [Entered: 11/12/2024 10:41 AM]
|
| Filing 5 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Javan J. Thompson leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 11/08/2024. [5] [7416634] [24-2904] (CG) [Entered: 11/08/2024 10:43 AM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER issued TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [4] [7416526] [24-2904] (CG) [Entered: 11/07/2024 04:11 PM]
|
| Filing 3 Motion filed by Appellant Javan J. Thompson to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [3] [7416499] [24-2904] (Beals, Bart) [Entered: 11/07/2024 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 2 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Javan J. Thompson. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [2] [7414702] [24-2904] (Beals, Bart) [Entered: 10/30/2024 01:27 PM] |
| Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Javan J. Thompson by 10/31/2024. Fee or IFP forms due on 11/07/2024 for Appellant Javan J. Thompson. Transcript information sheet due by 11/07/2024. [1] [7413674] [24-2904] (JMB) [Entered: 10/25/2024 09:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Javan Thompson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Katherine Virginia Boyle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JAVAN J. THOMPSON | |
| Represented By: | Thomas W. Patton |
| Represented By: | Elliot J. Louthen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
