Tarek Farag v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
| TAREK FARAG |
| MSNBC, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., KWAME RAOUL, FACEBOOK, INC., ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and J.B. PRITZKER |
| 24-2998 |
| November 4, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Environmental Matters |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Mandate issued. No record to be returned. [16] [7426379] [24-2998] (NHV) [Entered: 12/31/2024 10:12 AM] |
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 11/21/2024 Final Order and 12/23/2024 Petition for Rehearing Denial with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7426381-2] [7426381] [24-2998] (NHV) [Entered: 12/31/2024 10:16 AM] |
Filing 15
ORDER: Plaintiff-Appellant filed a petition for rehearing on December 2, 2024. All the judges on the panel have voted to deny rehearing. The petition for rehearing is therefore DENIED. [15] [7425427] [24-2998] (HTP) [Entered: 12/23/2024 02:55 PM]
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER re: 1. Motion for oral argument. 2. Motion to bring attention to overlooked evidence and to file electronically. [ # 12 ] [ # 13 ] The motions are DENIED as unnecessary. Appellants petition for rehearing is under consideration. Any further filings by appellant will be returned unfiled. MDF [14] [7422750] [24-2998] (PS) [Entered: 12/10/2024 11:45 AM]
|
| Filing 13 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Tarek Farag to bring the attention to an overlooked evidence and to become an electronic filer. [13] [7422597] [24-2998] (CAG) [Entered: 12/09/2024 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 12 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Tarek Farag for urgent oral argument to settle the hoax. [12] [7422156] [24-2998] (DAB) [Entered: 12/06/2024 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 11 Appearance form filed by Attorney Alexandrina Shrove for Appellee Kwame Raoul. Additional Parties: JB Pritzker. [11] [7421492] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [24-2998]--[Edited 12/05/2024 by FP to reflect that atty. Jones is termed and atty. Shrove is added to the docket.] (Shrove, Alexandrina) [Entered: 12/04/2024 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 10 10 copies Filed Petition for Rehearing by Appellant Tarek Farag. DIST. [10] [7421015] [24-2998] (DAB) [Entered: 12/02/2024 04:36 PM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER re: Motion to allow plaintiff-appellant to file electronically using the CM/ECF system. This matter comes before the court for its consideration upon the request of appellant Tarek Farag for leave to become an electronic filer, received by this court on November 19, 2024. This court has carefully reviewed the record in the district court, the record on appeal, and Farags motion. Based on this review, the court has determined that any issues that could be raised are insubstantial and that further briefing would not be helpful to the courts consideration of the issues. See Mather v. Village of Mundelein, 869 F.2d 356, 35758 (7th Cir. 1989) (court may summarily decide case where no member believes briefing would be useful). Summary disposition is appropriate . . . when the position of one party is so clearly correct as a matter of law that no substantial question regarding the outcome of the appeal exists. Williams v. Chrans, 42 F.3d 1137, 1139 (7th Cir. 1994) (quoting Joshua v. United States, 17 F.3d 378, 380 (Fed. Cir. 1994)). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED and that the district courts denial of Farags motion for a preliminary injunction is summarily AFFIRMED. [ # 8 ] Diane S. Sykes, Chief Judge; John Z. Lee, Circuit Judge and Doris L. Pryor, Circuit Judge. [9] [7419357] [24-2998] (HTP) [Entered: 11/21/2024 01:50 PM]
|
| Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Tarek Farag to become an electronic filer. [8] [7418627] [24-2998] (CAG) [Entered: 11/19/2024 10:58 AM] |
| Filing 7 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Tarek Farag. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [7] [7416920] [24-2998] (JR) [Entered: 11/11/2024 07:54 PM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: This court received notice from the District Court that the appellant paid the required docketing fee. Briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 12/09/2024 for Tarek Farag. Appellee's brief due on or before 01/07/2025 for Facebook, Inc., MSNBC and Kwame Raoul. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 01/28/2025 for Appellant Tarek Farag [6] [7416858] [24-2998] (CAG) [Entered: 11/08/2024 04:06 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Filed notice from the District Court that the appeal docketing fee was received. [5] [7416854] [24-2998] (CAG) [Entered: 11/08/2024 04:03 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7415835] [4] [7415835] [24-2998] (HTP) [Entered: 11/05/2024 10:36 AM]
|
| Filing 3 No attorney(s) added for Appellees Joseph R. Biden, Jr. and Alejandro Mayorkas, per District Court docket and information sheet. [3] [7415829] [24-2998] (HTP) [Entered: 11/05/2024 10:30 AM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Merrick Garland, Michael Regan, J.B. Pritzker, Dick Durbin, Tammy Duckworth, Sean Casten, United States Attorney Office The United States of America, CNN, CBS, CNBC, NPR, Washington Post, NY Times, Kamala Harris, Louis Dejoy, and Gil Quiniones. [2] [7415827] [24-2998] (HTP) [Entered: 11/05/2024 10:28 AM] |
| Filing 1 U.S. civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Tarek Farag by 11/08/2024. Transcript information sheet due by 11/18/2024. Fee or IFP forms due on 11/18/2024 for Appellant Tarek Farag. [1] [7415822] [24-2998] (HTP) [Entered: 11/05/2024 10:20 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
