Steven Crump v. Doe 2, et al
| STEVEN CRUMP |
| NAOMI MCGLONE, ANTHONY WILLS, Warden, Menard CC, TRAVIS WENTWORTH, JOHN BARWICK, official capacity/individual capacity, Warden Vienna Correctional Center, official capcity only and JOHN DOE, Head Admin/Processor of Parole Hearing at Menard |
| 24-3094 |
| November 15, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER re: Motion to dismiss appeal. This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42(b). The appellant shall remit to the clerk of the district court the $605 appellate fees. Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [ # 2 ][3][7425848] [24-3094] (HTP) [Entered: 12/27/2024 08:38 AM]
|
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 12/27/2024 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7425867-2] [7425867] [24-3094] (HTP) [Entered: 12/27/2024 09:08 AM] |
| Filing 2 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Steven Crump to dismiss case pursuant to FRAP 42(b). [2] [7425777] [24-3094] (CAG) [Entered: 12/26/2024 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 11/29/2024. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Steven Crump by 11/22/2024. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 12/16/2024. [1] [7418499] [24-3094] (AD) [Entered: 11/18/2024 03:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
