Joshua Howard v. Anthony Meli, et al
| JOSHUA HOWARD |
| DONALD STRAHOTA, RYAN HOLZMACHER, JAMES GREER, DAVID BURNETT and ANTHONY MELI |
| 24-3162 |
| November 26, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Joshua Howard v Anthony Meli |
| Joshua Howard v Anthony Meli |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: Briefing in this appeal is SUSPENDED pending resolution of the motion for appointment of counsel filed by the appellant on January 6, 2025. SCR [11] [7427406] [24-3162] (PS) [Entered: 01/07/2025 10:17 AM]
|
| Filing 10 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Joshua Howard for appointment of counsel or to extend time to file. [10] [7427302] [24-3162] (DAB) [Entered: 01/06/2025 04:47 PM] |
Filing 9
ORDER: The District Court GRANTED appellant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and this court has now received notice from the district court that the appellant paid the initial partial filing fee. Accordingly, Appellant's brief due on or before 01/17/2025 for Joshua Howard. Appellees' brief due on or before 02/18/2025 for David Burnett, James Greer, Ryan Holzmacher, Anthony Meli and Donald Strahota. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 03/11/2025 for Appellant Joshua Howard. JXK [9] [7424578] [24-3162] (AP) [Entered: 12/18/2024 03:40 PM]
|
| Filing 8 ***PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT PARTIAL FILING FEE. Received: $1.69 from Appellant Joshua Howard on 12/17/2024. [8] [7424112] [24-3162] (CAG) [Entered: 12/17/2024 09:55 AM] |
Filing 7
ORDER re: Motion for appointment of counsel. IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED without prejudice to renewal. Any renewed motion for appointment of counsel should include the reasons appellant needs counsel to assist in this appeal. SCR [ # 6 ] [7] [7423575] SCR [24-3162] (AP) [Entered: 12/13/2024 10:30 AM]
|
| Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Joshua Howard for appointment of counsel. [6] [7423448] [24-3162] (CAG) [Entered: 12/12/2024 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Joshua Howard. [5] [7423447] [24-3162] (CAG) [Entered: 12/12/2024 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Joshua Howard. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 24-2822 [4] [7423446] [24-3162] (CAG) [Entered: 12/12/2024 03:22 PM] |
| Filing 3 Appearance form filed by Attorney Brian P. Keenan for Appellees David Burnett, James Greer, Ryan Holzmacher, Anthony Meli and Donald Strahota. [3] [7420738] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [24-3162]--[Edited 12/02/2024 by PS - to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Keenan, Brian) [Entered: 12/02/2024 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Joshua Howard leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 11/22/2024. District Court has assessed a $1.69 initial partial filing fee. [2] [7420704] PLRA initial partial filing fee due by 12/23/2024. [24-3162] (CAG) [Entered: 12/02/2024 09:37 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. (Plaintiff's motion to proceed IFP on appeal was granted on 11/22/2024 and an initial partial filing fee of $1.69 was assessed.) Docketing Statement due for Appellant Joshua Howard by 11/25/2024. Transcript information sheet due by 12/10/2024. PLRA initial partial filing fee due by 12/23/2024. [1] [7420457] [24-3162] (PS) [Entered: 11/27/2024 09:09 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.