Steven Curry v. Travis Bantista, et al
| STEVEN CURRY |
| MATTHEW GOODWIN, KELLY RINZI and TRAVIS BANTISTA |
| 24-3185 |
| December 2, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER: Briefing in this appeal is SUSPENDED pending resolution of the motion for appointment of counsel filed by the appellant on January 15, 2025. CDH. [16] [7429359] [24-3185] (HTP) [Entered: 01/16/2025 09:54 AM]
|
| Filing 15 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Steven Curry for appointment of counsel. [15] [7429248] [24-3185] (EF) [Entered: 01/15/2025 03:53 PM] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER re: Plaintiff Appellant "Supplemental" Brief Argument in Support of why Defendants Bill of Cost should be Denied. In light of this courts December 30, 2024, order, appellant Steven Currys supplement to his motion will be filed without action. MDF [14] [7426714] [24-3185] (AD) [Entered: 01/03/2025 08:53 AM]
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER re: Request to respond to the Court of Appeals letter dated 12/19/2024. [ # 11 ] As stated in the courts order dated December 10, 2024, this appeal may proceed without a certificate of appealability. Further, the court has no record of the appellant filing a motion for appointment of counsel. To the extent that the appellant seeks appointment of counsel, that request should be made in a separate motion that specifically makes such a request and includes reasons in support. Briefing will proceed in accordance with the courts order dated December 19, 2024. The clerk shall send the appellant a copy of the courts public docket and a copy of this courts brief information sheet for pro se litigants so that the appellant may familiarize himself with the courts expectations for briefs. CDH [13] [7426518] [24-3185] (PS) [Entered: 12/31/2024 03:26 PM]
|
| Filing 12 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Steven Curry for brief in support of why defendants bull of cost should be denied. (Forwarded from the District Court). [12] [7426355] [24-3185] (CAG) [Entered: 12/31/2024 09:19 AM] |
| Filing 11 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Steven Curry for leave to respond to the Court of Appeals letter dated 12/19/2024. (Forwarded from the District Court). [11] [7426354] [24-3185] (CAG) [Entered: 12/31/2024 09:17 AM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER re: Motion for stay of bill of cost, filed on 12/23/2024. The motion is DENIED. [ # 9 ] MDF [10] [7426149] [24-3185] (FP) [Entered: 12/30/2024 10:31 AM]
|
| Filing 9 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Steven Curry for stay on bill of cost. (Forwarded from the District Court). [9] [7425233] [24-3185] (CAG) [Entered: 12/23/2024 09:58 AM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: This court has received notice from the district court that the appellant paid the required docketing fee. Accordingly, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 01/21/2025 for Steven Curry. Appellees' briefs due on or before 02/20/2025 for Travis Bantista, Matthew Goodwin and Kelly Rinzi. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 03/13/2025 for Appellant Steven Curry. JXK [7424867] [24-3185] (HTP) [Entered: 12/19/2024 03:44 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Filed Objection by Appellant Steven Curry to bill of cost 1981. (Forwarded from the District Court and similar to docket entry 5). [7][7424849] [24-3185] (CAG) [Entered: 12/19/2024 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed notice from the District Court that the $605.00 appellate fee was received. [6][7424799] [24-3185] (CAG) [Entered: 12/19/2024 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Objection by Appellant Steven Curry to bill of cost 1981. (Forwarded from the District Court). [5][7424227] [24-3185] (CAG) [Entered: 12/17/2024 02:22 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER re: Motion for leave of court to withdraw and refile application of certificate of appealability and notice to file a motion for informa pauperis, filed on 12/6/2024. A review of this courts docket shows that this appeal may proceed without a certificate of appealability. To the extent that the appellant is seeking an extension of time, the motion is GRANTED to the extent that the appellant shall either pay the $605.00 appellate filing fees in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis together with a PLRA memorandum in support and prison trust fund statement with the clerk of this court by January 15, 2025. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this appeal. [ # 2 ] Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 5270 0423 8761 35. [4] [7422719] SCR [24-3185] (FP) [Entered: 12/10/2024 10:52 AM]
|
| Filing 3 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Steven Curry leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 12/02/2024. [3] [7422378] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 01/08/2025. [24-3185] (CAG) [Entered: 12/09/2024 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 2 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Steven Curry for leave of court to withdraw and refile application for certificate of appealability and notice of leave to file a motion for in forma pauperis. (Forwarded from the District Court). [2] [7422339] [24-3185] (CAG) [Entered: 12/06/2024 04:39 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. Date IFP denied: 12/02/2024. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing statement filed. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 01/02/2025. Transcript information sheet due by 12/16/2024. [1] [7421138] [24-3185] (HTP) [Entered: 12/03/2024 10:38 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
