Anthony Boyce v. Jason Peterburs, et al
Plaintiff: ANTHONY BOYCE
Defendant: COOK COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE, STATE OF ILLINOIS, KIMBERLY FOX, JOHN DOE and JASON PETERBURS
Case Number: 24-3230
Filed: December 9, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 22, 2025 Anthony Boyce v Jason Peterburs

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2025 Filing 21 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Anthony Boyce in 24-3230, 24-3315 leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 02/05/2025. [21] [7433385] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 03/10/2025. [24-3230, 24-3315] (CAG) [Entered: 02/06/2025 03:45 PM]
February 5, 2025 Filing 20 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Anthony Boyce to vacate, alter, or amend judgment. [20] [7433100] [24-3230] (DAB) [Entered: 02/05/2025 02:56 PM]
January 13, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER re: Motion for instructions and clarification on appeal. [ # 18 ] This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket shows that on December 26, 2024, the appellant's motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis was transferred to the district court and remains pending before the district court. The appellant has no pending deadlines in appeal no. 24-3230. Accordingly, any other relief requested in the appellants motion is DENIED without court action, pursuant to the courts fee notice and order dated December 9, 2024. If the appellant would like copies of items in the district court record, he should make that request in the district court. Finally, a review of the district courts docket shows that on December 9, 2024, the district court construed Boyces notice of intent as a notice of appeal which was opened as appeal no. 24-3230. [19] [7428557] CDH [24-3230] (CG) [Entered: 01/13/2025 02:58 PM]
January 8, 2025 Filing 18 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Anthony Boyce for clarification. [18] [7427902] [24-3230] (CAG) [Entered: 01/08/2025 03:49 PM]
January 6, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER re: Letter. In light of the courts order dated December 31, 2024, the appellants letter will be filed without further court action. SCR [17] [7427112] [24-3230] (HTP) [Entered: 01/06/2025 11:31 AM]
January 3, 2025 Filing 16 Filed letter from Appellant Anthony Boyce. [16] [7426952] [24-3230] (DAB) [Entered: 01/03/2025 03:46 PM]
December 31, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER re: 1. Motion to seek request docketing entire entries and proceedings. 2. Motion for filing fee. [ # 14 ] [ # 13 ] The court notes that the appellants motion requesting docketing entries states that the appellant does not need transcripts. The clerk shall send the appellant a copy of the courts public docket. If the appellant would like copies of items in the district court record, he should make that request in the district court. The appellants motion concerning the filing fee asks the court to order five dollars to be resent. A review of the docket indicates that the appellant has not paid the appellate filing fees for this appeal and the appellants motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis remains pending in the district court. Further, according to this courts Miscellaneous Fee Schedule dated December 1, 2023, the fee for docketing a case on appeal or review is $600.00. There is an additional statutory fee of $5.00 that is collected under 28 U.S.C. 1917. The appellant is again reminded that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, any other relief requested in the appellants motions is DENIED without court action, pursuant to the courts fee notice and order dated December 9, 2024. [15] [7426478] CDH [24-3230] (CG) [Entered: 12/31/2024 02:06 PM]
December 30, 2024 Filing 14 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Anthony Boyce for filing fee. [14] [7426312] [24-3230] (DAB) [Entered: 12/30/2024 04:14 PM]
December 30, 2024 Filing 13 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Anthony Boyce "to seek request docketing entire entries and proceedings." [13] [7426310] [24-3230] (DAB) [Entered: 12/30/2024 04:12 PM]
December 30, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: Motion to seek the court to order the initial filing fee from the trust fund officer. This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket indicates the appellants motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis remains pending in the district court. Further, a review of the district courts docket shows that no appellees nor attorney for the appellees filed an appearance in the district court before the district court entered its final order and judgment. Because no appellees or counsel for the appellees were served by the district court or made an appearance in that court, there are no appellees involved in this appeal. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that any relief requested in the appellants motion is DENIED without court action, pursuant to the courts fee notice and order dated December 9, 2024. [ # 7 ] [12] [7426253] CDH [24-3230] (AP) [Entered: 12/30/2024 02:57 PM]
December 27, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: Motion for attorney representation, filed on 12/26/2024. This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket indicates that the appellants fee status has not yet been determined. Specifically, the appellants motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is currently pending before the district court. Accordingly, to the extent that the appellant requests appointment of counsel, the motion is DENIED without court action, pursuant to the courts fee notice and order dated December 9, 2024. The clerk shall send the appellant a copy of the courts public docket. [ # 5 ] [11] [7425995] CDH [24-3230] (FP) [Entered: 12/27/2024 01:50 PM]
December 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. [10] [7425796] JR [24-3230] (CG) [Entered: 12/26/2024 03:29 PM]
December 26, 2024 Filing 9 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Anthony Boyce to seek the court to order the 5 dollar initial filing fees from trust fund officer and notify the courts all defendants was mailed entire pleadings or case Filed Notice of intent by Appellant Anthony Boyce. [9] [7425775] [24-3230]--[Edited 12/30/2024 by DAB to correct filing type] (DAB) [Entered: 12/26/2024 03:14 PM]
December 26, 2024 Filing 8 1 copy Appellant's brief filed by Appellant Anthony Boyce. [8] [7425774] [24-3230] (DAB) [Entered: 12/26/2024 03:13 PM]
December 26, 2024 Filing 7 Filed Appellant Anthony Boyce Memorandum In Support of PLRA Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis. Pro se motion filed by Appellant Anthony Boyce for permission to file appeal decision. [7] [7425772] [24-3230]--[Edited 12/27/2024 by DAB to correct filing type] (DAB) [Entered: 12/26/2024 03:12 PM]
December 26, 2024 Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Anthony Boyce in 24-3230, 24-3315 to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [6] [7425758] [24-3230, 24-3315] (DAB) [Entered: 12/26/2024 02:59 PM]
December 26, 2024 Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Anthony Boyce for appointment of counsel. [5] [7425757] [24-3230] (DAB) [Entered: 12/26/2024 02:57 PM]
December 9, 2024 Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Anthony Boyce. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [4] [7422867] [24-3230] (JR) [Entered: 12/10/2024 02:44 PM]
December 9, 2024 Filing 3 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: John Doe, sued as individual and office capacity; John Doe Supervisors; John Doe, telephone company; Cook County public defender office. [3] [7422822] [24-3230] (FP) [Entered: 12/10/2024 01:29 PM]
December 9, 2024 Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7422820] (Note: The Office of the IL Attorney General has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [24-3230] (FP) [Entered: 12/10/2024 01:21 PM]
December 9, 2024 Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 12/23/2024. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Anthony Boyce by 12/16/2024. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 01/08/2025. [1] [7422807] [24-3230] (FP) [Entered: 12/10/2024 01:03 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Anthony Boyce v. Jason Peterburs, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COOK COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STATE OF ILLINOIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KIMBERLY FOX
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JASON PETERBURS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ANTHONY BOYCE
Represented By: Anthony Boyce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?