Clarence Shed v. Joe Bredemann, et al
| CLARENCE SHED |
| JOHN SAGAT, JR., VICTOR MARTINEZ, FRATERNAL ENTERPRISES LP, d/b/a BREDEMANN FORD and JOE BREDEMANN |
| 24-3238 |
| December 10, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: The appellees may file, on or before January 6, 2025, a response to appellants jurisdictional memorandum, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of December 11, 2024. JXK [5] [7425436] [24-3238] (CG) [Entered: 12/23/2024 03:24 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Clarence Shed. [4] [7425038] [24-3238] (CAH) [Entered: 12/20/2024 12:34 PM] |
| Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Clarence Shed. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 24-3218 [3] [7424844] [24-3238] (CAG) [Entered: 12/19/2024 03:10 PM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Appellant shall file, on or before December 26, 2024, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal under Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure will satisfy this requirement. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) JXK [7423092] [2] [7423092] [24-3238] (PS) [Entered: 12/11/2024 11:12 AM]
|
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Clarence Shed by 12/16/2024. Transcript information sheet due by 12/24/2024. Appellant's brief due on or before 01/21/2025 for Clarence Shed. [1] [7422891] [24-3238] (JMB) [Entered: 12/10/2024 03:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
