Workeasy Software, LLC v. Maria Tapia-Rendon
| WORKEASY SOFTWARE, LLC, formerly known as EASY WORKFORCE SOFTWARE, LLC |
| MARIA TAPIA-RENDON, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| 24-8004 |
| February 16, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 Petition for Permission to appeal pursuant to F.R.C.P. 23(f) docketed. [1] [7365158] [24-8004] (CG) [Entered: 02/16/2024 04:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Workeasy Software, LLC v. Maria Tapia-Rendon | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: WORKEASY SOFTWARE, LLC, formerly known as EASY WORKFORCE SOFTWARE, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Josh M. Kantrow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MARIA TAPIA-RENDON, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated | |
| Represented By: | James Dominick Larry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
