Dana Watson v. Metropolitan Enforcement Group, et al
| DANA WATSON |
| KEVIN CROLLY, TONY LUTHER, MATT EVERS, ILLINOIS STATE POLICE, JOSH HUNT, MATT WERNER, SCOTT PRITCHETT, JOE BELIVEAU, BOB PATTERSON, KAREN GORDON and METROPOLITAN ENFORCEMENT GROUP OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS |
| 25-1051 |
| January 13, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Dana Watson v Metropolitan Enforcement Group |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Prose motion filed by Appellant Dana Watson to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [8] [7433894] [25-1051] (EF) [Entered: 02/10/2025 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Dana Watson leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 02/03/2025. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 03/06/2025 for Appellant Dana Watson. [7432708] [7] [7432708] [25-1051] (CG) [Entered: 02/04/2025 09:29 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Dana Watson. [6] [7430195] [25-1051] (CAG) [Entered: 01/21/2025 04:51 PM] |
| Filing 5 Amended Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Dana Watson. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [5] [7430194] [25-1051] (CAG) [Entered: 01/21/2025 04:50 PM] |
| Filing 4 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [4] [7429526] [25-1051] (AP) [Entered: 01/16/2025 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Dana Watson. Prior or Related proceedings: No. (Forwarded from the District Court). [3] [7429481] [25-1051] (CAG) [Entered: 01/16/2025 01:30 PM] |
Filing 2
ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellees brief. Redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken and may result in disciplinary sanctions. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7428714] [2] [7428714] [25-1051] (JMB) [Entered: 01/14/2025 10:08 AM]
|
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Dana Watson by 01/21/2025. Transcript information sheet due by 01/27/2025. Fee or IFP forms due on 01/27/2025 for Appellant Dana Watson. [1] [7428706] [25-1051] (JMB) [Entered: 01/14/2025 09:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
