Ray Stevenson v. John Luetcher, et al
| RAY L. STEVENSON |
| JOHN LUETCHER, JOHN RICHARD FISKE and SCOTT ASPLUNG |
| 25-1162 |
| February 4, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Filed Appellant Ray L. Stevenson Memorandum In Support of PLRA Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis. [13] [7439198] [25-1162] (CAG) [Entered: 03/07/2025 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 12 Prose motion filed by Appellant Ray L. Stevenson to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [12] [7439197] [25-1162] (CAG) [Entered: 03/07/2025 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 11 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Ray L. Stevenson to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [11] [7437473] [25-1162] (DAB) [Entered: 02/27/2025 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Ray L. Stevenson leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 02/21/2025. [10] [7436367] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 03/26/2025. [25-1162] (CAG) [Entered: 02/24/2025 09:55 AM] |
Filing 9
ORDER re: Motion for the Appointment of Counsel Pursuant to 1915. This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket indicates that the appellants fee status has not yet been determined. Specifically, the appellants motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is currently pending before the district court. Accordingly, to the extent that the appellant requests appointment of counsel, the motion is DENIED without court action, pursuant to the courts fee notice and order dated February 4, 2025. [ # 6 ] [9] [7435875] CDH [25-1162] (AD) [Entered: 02/20/2025 12:29 PM]
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. [8] [7435854] CDH [25-1162] (CG) [Entered: 02/20/2025 11:36 AM]
|
| Filing 7 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [7] [7435837] [25-1162] (CAG) [Entered: 02/20/2025 11:07 AM] |
| Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Ray L. Stevenson for appointment of counsel. [6] [7435358] [25-1162] (CAG) [Entered: 02/18/2025 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Ray L. Stevenson. [5] [7435355] [25-1162] (CAG) [Entered: 02/18/2025 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 4 Prose motion filed by Appellant Ray L. Stevenson to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [4] [7435353] [25-1162] (CAG) [Entered: 02/18/2025 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Ray L. Stevenson. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [3] [7435352] [25-1162] (CAG) [Entered: 02/18/2025 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7432803] [25-1162] (PS) [Entered: 02/04/2025 12:22 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Ray L. Stevenson by 02/10/2025. Transcript information sheet due by 02/18/2025. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 03/06/2025. [1] [7432796] [25-1162] (PS) [Entered: 02/04/2025 12:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
