Nathan Huiras v. Racine County, et al
| NATHAN JOHN HUIRAS |
| RACINE COUNTY, KELLY LARSEN, DIRK JENSEN, ALICE A. RUDEBUSCH and STEVEN W. BEAL |
| 25-1263 |
| February 19, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Nathan John Huiras to certify constitutional challenge (Rule 44 of Federal Rules and Appellate Procedure). [21] [7446765] [25-1263] (CAG) [Entered: 04/15/2025 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 20 Filed Certificate of Service to docketing statement filed on 03/19/2025 and on 03/21/2025 by Appellant Nathan John Huiras. [20] [7445780] [25-1263] (NHV) [Entered: 04/09/2025 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 19 10 copies Filed Appendix by Appellant Nathan John Huiras. [19] [7445627] [25-1263] (DAB) [Entered: 04/09/2025 11:17 AM] |
| Filing 18 10 copies Appellant's brief filed by Appellant Nathan John Huiras. Appellee's brief due on or before 05/09/2025 for Steven W. Beal, Dirk Jensen, Kelly Larsen, Racine County and Alice A. Rudebusch. REMINDER: If a case is designated to proceed to oral argument, hearing notices will be mailed shortly before the date of oral argument. Please note that counsel's unavailability for oral argument must be submitted by letter, filed electronically with the Clerk's Office, and should be made by no later than seven days after the filing of the appellee's brief. See Cir. R. 34(b)(3), (4). The court's calendar is located at https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/cal/argcalendar.pdf. Once scheduled, oral argument is rescheduled only in extraordinary circumstances. See Cir. R. 34(b)(4), (e). [18] [7445626] [25-1263] (DAB) [Entered: 04/09/2025 11:16 AM] |
| Filing 17 Annotated copy of docket #15 filed by Appellant Nathan John Huiras. [17] [7444560] [25-1263] (DAB) [Entered: 04/03/2025 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 16 Annotated copy of docket #14 filed by Appellant Nathan John Huiras. [16] [7444557] [25-1263] (DAB) [Entered: 04/03/2025 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 15 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Micaela E. Brinsley for Appellees Racine County, Kelly Larsen, Dirk Jensen, Alice A. Rudebusch and Steven W. Beal. [15] [7443002] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [25-1263] [15] [7443002] [25-1263]--[Edited 03/27/2025 by HTP to reflect addition of counsel.] (Brinsley, Micaela) [Entered: 03/27/2025 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 14 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Samuel C. Hall, Jr. for Appellees Racine County, Kelly Larsen, Dirk Jensen, Alice A. Rudebusch and Steven W. Beal. [14] [7443000] (L-Yes; E-No; R-No) [25-1263] [14] [7443000] [25-1263]--[Edited 03/27/2025 by HTP to reflect addition of counsel.] (Hall, Samuel) [Entered: 03/27/2025 02:21 PM] |
| Filing 13 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Nathan John Huiras. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [13] [7441997] [25-1263] (NHV) [Entered: 03/21/2025 04:32 PM] |
| Filing 12 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Nathan John Huiras. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [12] [7441252] [25-1263] (CAG) [Entered: 03/19/2025 10:46 AM] |
| Filing 11 Filed notice of constitutional question certificate of servie by Appellant Nathan John Huiras. [11] [7441099] [25-1263] (CAG) [Entered: 03/18/2025 02:46 PM] |
Filing 10
ORDER re: Affidavit Accompanying Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis. A review of the docket shows that on March 7, 2025, the district court granted the appellants motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Accordingly, the motion is DENIED as unnecessary. [ # 6 ] CDH [10] [7439434] [25-1263] (AD) [Entered: 03/10/2025 11:00 AM]
|
Filing 9
ORDER: On March 7, 2025, the District Court granted the plaintiffs motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that briefing in this appeal will now proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 04/09/2025 for Nathan John Huiras. The appellant is reminded that his overdue Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement is due by March 19, 2025. JR [7439407] [25-1263] (JMB) [Entered: 03/10/2025 10:22 AM]
|
| Filing 8 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Nathan John Huiras leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 03/07/2025. [8] [7439270] [25-1263] (AP) [Entered: 03/07/2025 04:18 PM] |
Filing 7
ORDER: Appellant Nathan John Huiras is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Nathan John Huiras by 03/19/2025. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 5270 1455 1944 40. [7] [7438433] [25-1263] (AD) [Entered: 03/05/2025 08:48 AM]
|
| Filing 6 Prose motion filed by Appellant Nathan John Huiras to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [6] [7437440] [25-1263] (CAG) [Entered: 02/27/2025 03:15 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER issued TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [5] [7436879] [25-1263] (CG) [Entered: 02/25/2025 03:59 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Prose motion filed by Appellant Nathan John Huiras to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [4] [7436846] [25-1263] (CAH) [Entered: 02/25/2025 03:37 PM] |
| Filing 3 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEE: Andrew Patch. [3] [7435590] [25-1263] (HTP) [Entered: 02/19/2025 12:24 PM] |
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7435588] [25-1263] (HTP) [Entered: 02/19/2025 12:20 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Nathan John Huiras by 02/25/2025. Transcript information sheet due by 03/05/2025. Fee or IFP forms due on 03/05/2025 for Appellant Nathan John Huiras. [1] [7435584] [25-1263] (HTP) [Entered: 02/19/2025 12:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.