David Garcia v. Josh Durbin, et al
| DAVID GARCIA |
| JOSH DURBIN, DINA PAUL and VIPIN SHAH |
| 25-1295 |
| February 24, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER re: Motion to withdraw. This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42(b). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [ # 5 ][6][7439036] [25-1295] (JMB) [Entered: 03/07/2025 10:12 AM]
|
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 03/07/2025 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7439044-2] [7439044] [25-1295] (JMB) [Entered: 03/07/2025 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant David Garcia to withdraw appeal. [5] [7438690] [25-1295]--[Edited 03/05/2025 by PS - docket text updated.] (CAG) [Entered: 03/05/2025 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 4 Attorney Bradley J. Taylor for Vipin Shah and Dina Paul in 25-1295 terminated and added Attorney(s) Julie Ann Teuscher for party(s) Appellee Vipin Shah Appellee Dina Paul, in case 25-1295 per disclosure statement. Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Julie A. Teuscher for Appellees Dina Paul and Vipin Shah. [4] [7437081] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [25-1295]--[Edited 02/26/2025 by AD to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Teuscher, Julie) [Entered: 02/26/2025 12:05 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Appellant shall file, on or before March 11, 2025, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal under Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure will satisfy this requirement. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) JXK [7436864] [3] [7436864] [25-1295] (PS) [Entered: 02/25/2025 03:49 PM]
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7436812] JXK [2] [7436812] [25-1295] (AD) [Entered: 02/25/2025 02:58 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 03/10/2025. Docketing Statement due for Appellant David Garcia by 03/03/2025. Fee or IFP forms due on 03/10/2025 for Appellant David Garcia. [1] [7436787] [25-1295] (AD) [Entered: 02/25/2025 02:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
