Steven Curry v. Mary Cerda, et al
| STEVEN CURRY |
| MARY CERDA and ADOBERTO TORREZ |
| 25-1298 |
| February 24, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 10 copies Appellant's brief filed by Appellant Steven Curry, per order. REMINDER: If a case is designated to proceed to oral argument, hearing notices will be mailed shortly before the date of oral argument. Please note that counsel's unavailability for oral argument must be submitted by letter, filed electronically with the Clerk's Office, and should be made by no later than seven days after the filing of the appellee's brief. See Cir. R. 34(b)(3), (4). The court's calendar is located at https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/cal/argcalendar.pdf. Once scheduled, oral argument is rescheduled only in extraordinary circumstances. See Cir. R. 34(b)(4), (e). [15] [7446048] [25-1298] (DAB) [Entered: 04/10/2025 04:23 PM] |
Filing 14
ORDER re: Motion seeking leave of court to withdraw plaintiff-appellant brief on file and accept plaintiff-appellant amend application for certificate of appealability. To the extent that the appellant would like the tendered motion for leave to submit amended argument in support of application for certificate of appealability to serve as his opening brief, the motion is GRANTED to the extent that the clerk shall file INSTANTER the tendered motion as the opening brief of the appellant. [ # 13 ] CDH [14] [7446009] [25-1298] (HTP) [Entered: 04/10/2025 03:18 PM]
|
| Filing 13 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Steven Curry to file amended motion for COA. 1 copy amended motion for COA tendered. [13] [7445816] [25-1298] (DAB) [Entered: 04/09/2025 04:28 PM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER: This court has received notice from the district court that the appellant paid the required docketing fee. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 04/21/2025 for Steven Curry. Appellees' brief due on or before 05/21/2025 for Mary Cerda and Adoberto Torrez. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 06/11/2025 for Appellant Steven Curry. JXK [7441916] [25-1298] (JMB) [Entered: 03/21/2025 02:49 PM]
|
| Filing 11 Filed notice from the District Court that the $605.00 appellate fee was received. [11][7441826] [25-1298] (CAG) [Entered: 03/21/2025 11:52 AM] |
| Filing 10 Filed Appellant Steven Curry Memorandum In Support of PLRA Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis. [10] [7439647] [25-1298] (CAG) [Entered: 03/11/2025 10:07 AM] |
| Filing 9 Amended argument in support of application for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Steven Curry, per order. [9] [7438933] [25-1298] (PS) [Entered: 03/06/2025 04:00 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER re: Motion for leave of court to withdraw appellant brief on file and accept amended application for certificate of appealability. [ # 7 ] To the extent that the appellant seeks to file an amended request for a certificate of appealability, the motion is GRANTED only to the extent that the clerk shall file INSTANTER the tendered amended argument in support of application for certificate of appealability. Because this appeal may proceed without a certificate of appealability, the appellants amended motion will be filed without further court action. CDH [8] [7438930] [25-1298] (PS) [Entered: 03/06/2025 03:52 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Steven Curry for leave of court to withdraw appellant brief on file and to accept appellant "amended" application for certificate of appealability. (Forwarded from the District Court). [7] [7438637] [25-1298] (CAG) [Entered: 03/05/2025 02:37 PM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER re: Argument in support of application for certificate of appealability. This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket indicates that the appellant's motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending in the district court. Also, once the appellants fee status has been determined, this appeal may proceed without a certificate of appealability. Accordingly, the court will take no action on the appellants motion. [6] [7437721] CDH [25-1298] (CG) [Entered: 02/28/2025 03:24 PM]
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. [5] [7437707] JR [25-1298] (CG) [Entered: 02/28/2025 02:53 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Steven Curry. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 24-3185 [4] [7437656] [25-1298] (CAG) [Entered: 02/28/2025 01:18 PM] |
| Filing 3 Prose motion filed by Appellant Steven Curry to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [3] [7437655] [25-1298] (CAG) [Entered: 02/28/2025 01:17 PM] |
| Filing 2 Argument in support of application for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Steven Curry. (Forwarded from the District Court). [2] [7437328] [25-1298] (CAG) [Entered: 02/27/2025 11:32 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Steven Curry by 03/03/2025. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 03/26/2025. Transcript information sheet due by 03/10/2025. [1] [7436646] [25-1298] (JMB) [Entered: 02/25/2025 09:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
