USA v. Richard White
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| RICHARD WHITE |
| 25-1326 |
| February 27, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Ruth F. Masters for Appellant Richard White in 25-1326. [8] [7447082] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [25-1326, 24-2050, 24-2766, 25-1221] (Masters, Ruth) [Entered: 04/16/2025 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Richard White. [7] [7446184] [25-1326] (Drohosky, Stacy) [Entered: 04/11/2025 12:08 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER issued GRANTING motion to withdraw. [ # 4 ] Attorney Ruth F. Masters, MASTERSLAW LLC, 1101 Lake Street, Oak Park, IL 60301, is appointed to represent defendant-appellant Richard White in appeal no. 25-1326 pursuant to the provisions of the Criminal Justice Act. Counsel is directed to contact the defendant-appellant immediately. Briefing will proceed as follows: Appellants' briefs due on or before 06/12/2025 for Herman Troy Jefferson, Kenneth Christopher McGhee, Brandon R. Parks and Richard White. Appellee's consolidated brief due on or before 07/14/2025 for United States of America. Appellants' reply briefs, if any, is due on or before 08/04/2025 for Appellants Herman Troy Jefferson, Kenneth Christopher McGhee, Brandon R. Parks and Richard White Attorney John Maksimovich for Richard White in 25-1326. Counsel for appellants are encouraged to avoid unnecessary duplication by filing a joint brief or a joint appendix or by adopting parts of a co-appellants brief. Duplicative briefing will be stricken. Appellants, however, may not adopt the Jurisdictional Statement of another. Each appellants brief must include a complete Jurisdictional Statement. Appellees brief must comply with Circuit Rule 28(b). Finally, the District Court shall add attorney Ruth F. Masters to their CM/ECF database for purposes of accessing District Court documents, including sealed docket entries not filed ex parte. JLG [6] [7440566] [24-2050, 24-2766, 25-1221, 25-1326] (AD) [Entered: 03/14/2025 05:23 PM]
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Briefing in these consolidated appeals is SUSPENDED pending resolution of the motion to withdraw and for appointment of counsel filed on March 11, 2025, in appeal no. 25-1326. CDH [5] [7439962] [24-2050, 24-2766, 25-1221, 25-1326] (FP) [Entered: 03/12/2025 11:25 AM]
|
| Attorney David E. Hollar for USA is terminated and Attorney Nathaniel Whalen for Appellee USA is added pursuant to email notification from the Office of the U.S. Attorney regarding counsel of record. [7440034-2] [7440034] [23-1120, 23-1231, 23-2315, 23-2891, 24-1086, 24-1087, 24-1251, 24-1447, 24-1926, 24-2008, 24-2050, 24-2766, 25-1221, 25-1326, 24-2059] (VG) [Entered: 03/12/2025 02:43 PM] |
| Filing 4 Motion filed by Attorney John Maksimovich for Appellant Richard White to withdraw as counsel and for appointment of new counsel. [4] [7439831] [25-1326]--[Edited 03/11/2025 by PS - to reflect attorney filer and full motion title.] (Maksimovich, John) [Entered: 03/11/2025 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Richard White. [3] [7438953] [25-1326] (Maksimovich, John) [Entered: 03/06/2025 04:49 PM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: The court orders these appeals CONSOLIDATED for purposes of briefing and disposition. The briefing schedule is as follows: 1. The appellants shall file their briefs and required short appendices on or before May 19, 2025. 2. The appellee shall file its consolidated brief on or before June 18, 2025. 3. The appellants shall file their reply briefs, if any, on or before July 9, 2025. Counsel for appellants are encouraged to avoid unnecessary duplication by filing a joint brief or a joint appendix or by adopting parts of a co-appellants brief. Duplicative briefing will be stricken and may result in disciplinary sanctions against counsel. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). Appellants, however, may not adopt the Jurisdictional Statement of another. Each appellants brief must include a complete Jurisdictional Statement. JXK [2] [7437412] [24-2050, 24-2766, 25-1221, 25-1326] (FP) [Entered: 02/27/2025 02:40 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. IFP. Docketing statement filed. Appellant's brief due on or before 04/08/2025 for Richard White. Transcript information sheet due by 03/13/2025. Motion to Withdraw or to Appoint Counsel pursuant to Circuit Rule 46.1 due for Appellant Richard White by 03/13/2025. [1] [7437334] [25-1326] (JMB) [Entered: 02/27/2025 11:39 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Richard White | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Nathaniel Whalen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: RICHARD WHITE | |
| Represented By: | Ruth F. Masters |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
