Antonio Smith v. Eric Peters, et al
| ANTONIO M. SMITH |
| ERIC PETERS, EMILY LELAND, LARRY FUCHS, RYAN BLOUNT and KEVIN W. PITZEN |
| 25-1513 |
| March 26, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 10 copies Appellant's brief filed by Appellant Antonio M. Smith. REMINDER: If a case is designated to proceed to oral argument, hearing notices will be mailed shortly before the date of oral argument. Please note that counsel's unavailability for oral argument must be submitted by letter, filed electronically with the Clerk's Office, and should be made by no later than seven days after the filing of the appellee's brief. See Cir. R. 34(b)(3), (4). The court's calendar is located at https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/cal/argcalendar.pdf. Once scheduled, oral argument is rescheduled only in extraordinary circumstances. See Cir. R. 34(b)(4), (e). [20] [7473823] [25-1513] (CAH) [Entered: 09/09/2025 03:39 PM] |
Filing 19
ORDER issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellant's brief. [ # 18 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 09/29/2025 for Antonio M. Smith. Appellees' briefs due on or before 10/29/2025 for Ryan Blount, Larry Fuchs, Emily Leland, Eric Peters and Kevin W. Pitzen. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 11/19/2025 for Appellant Antonio M. Smith. SCR [19] [7471781] [25-1513] (CG) [Entered: 09/02/2025 08:47 AM]
|
| Filing 18 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Antonio M. Smith to extend time to file appellant's brief. [18] [7471693] [25-1513] (CAH) [Entered: 08/29/2025 03:01 PM] |
|
Filing 17
ORDER: On consideration of the response to the Rule to Show Cause filed 08/06/2025 by Appellant Antonio M. Smith, IT IS ORDERED that the Rule to Show Cause is SUSPENDED pending the timely filing of a brief by the party(s). CDH Briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 08/21/2025 for Antonio M. Smith. Appellees' briefs are due on or before 09/22/2025 for Ryan Blount, Larry Fuchs, Emily Leland, Eric Peters and Kevin W. Pitzen. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 10/14/2025 for Appellant Antonio M. Smith. Failure to file a brief by this due date may result in the dismissal of this appeal for failure to prosecute. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 5270 1455 1955 91. [17] [7467654] [25-1513] (FP) [Entered: 08/08/2025 10:01 AM]
|
| Filing 16 Filed Show Cause Response by Appellant Antonio M. Smith. [16][7467337] [25-1513] (CAH) [Entered: 08/06/2025 03:29 PM] |
|
Filing 15
ORDER: Appellant Antonio M. Smith is directed to show cause as to why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to C. R. 31(c)(2). GW. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. Response to Rule to Show Cause due for Appellant Antonio M. Smith by 08/04/2025. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589071052702984957285. [15] [7464123] [25-1513] (GW) [Entered: 07/21/2025 04:03 PM]
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellant's brief. [ # 13 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 07/11/2025 for Antonio M. Smith. Appellees' briefs due on or before 08/11/2025 for Ryan Blount, Larry Fuchs, Emily Leland, Eric Peters and Kevin W. Pitzen. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 09/02/2025 for Appellant Antonio M. Smith. CDH [14] [7458698] [25-1513] (AD) [Entered: 06/20/2025 12:25 PM]
|
| Filing 13 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Antonio M. Smith to extend time to file appellant's brief. [13] [7458498] [25-1513] (NHV) [Entered: 06/18/2025 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 12 Appearance form filed by Attorney Jody Schmelzer for Appellees Eric Peters, Larry Fuchs, Ryan Blount and Kevin W. Pitzen. Additional Parties: Cooper Lange, Dustin Rohwer, Jeremiah Phipps, Jeffery Nguyen, Paul Fosshage. [12] [7453507] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [25-1513]--[Edited 05/21/2025 by FP to reflect that atty. Paulson is termed and atty. Schmelzer is added to the docket.] (Schmelzer, Jody) [Entered: 05/20/2025 04:24 PM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER re: Motion for extension of time, filed on 5/12/2025. The Rule to Show Cause is SUSPENDED pending the timely filing of a brief by the party. The motion is GRANTED only to the extent that briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 06/12/2025 for Antonio M. Smith. Appellees' briefs are due on or before 07/14/2025 for Ryan Blount, Larry Fuchs, Emily Leland, Eric Peters and Kevin W. Pitzen. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 08/04/2025 for Appellant Antonio M. Smith. CDH [ # 10 ][11] [7451922] [25-1513] (FP) [Entered: 05/13/2025 10:31 AM]
|
| Filing 10 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Antonio M. Smith to extend time to file appellant's brief. [10] [7451815] [25-1513] (CAH) [Entered: 05/12/2025 04:40 PM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Appellant Antonio M. Smith is directed to show cause as to why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to C. R. 31(c)(2). GW. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. Response to Rule to Show Cause due for Appellant Antonio M. Smith by 05/27/2025. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589071052700423875282. [9] [7451595] [25-1513] (GW) [Entered: 05/12/2025 08:56 AM]
|
| Filing 8 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Antonio M. Smith. [8] [7448602] [25-1513] (JMB) [Entered: 04/24/2025 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 7 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Antonio M. Smith. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [7] [7444524] [25-1513] (HTP) [Entered: 04/03/2025 02:03 PM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: This court has received notice from the district court that the appellant paid the required docketing fee. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 05/02/2025 for Antonio M. Smith. Appellees' briefs due on or before 06/02/2025 for Ryan Blount, Larry Fuchs, Emily Leland, Eric Peters and Kevin W. Pitzen. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 06/23/2025 for Appellant Antonio M. Smith. JXK [7444192] [25-1513] (JMB) [Entered: 04/02/2025 12:20 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Zachary J. Flood for Appellee Emily Leland. [5] [7444113] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [25-1513] (Flood, Zachary) [Entered: 04/02/2025 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 4 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Samuel C. Hall, Jr. for Appellee Emily Leland. [4] [7444110] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [25-1513] [4] [7444110] [25-1513]--[Edited 04/02/2025 by HTP to reflect addition of counsel.] (Hall, Samuel) [Entered: 04/02/2025 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed notice from the District Court that the $605.00 appellate fee was received. [3][7444037] [25-1513] (CAG) [Entered: 04/01/2025 04:29 PM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Cooper Lange, Dustin Rohwer, Jeremiah Phipps, Jeffery Nguyen, Paul Fosshage. [2] [7442898] [25-1513] (JMB) [Entered: 03/27/2025 09:46 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Antonio M. Smith by 04/02/2025. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 04/25/2025. Transcript information sheet due by 04/09/2025. [1] [7442894] [25-1513] (JMB) [Entered: 03/27/2025 09:39 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
