Daniel Bartelt v. Bradley Mlodzik
| DANIEL J. BARTELT |
| BRADLEY MLODZIK |
| 25-1569 |
| April 3, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Daniel J. Bartelt leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 04/08/2025. [2] [7447532] [25-1569] (JR) [Entered: 04/18/2025 09:27 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 03/06/2025. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet filed. [1] [7444488] [25-1569] (AD) [Entered: 04/03/2025 12:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Daniel Bartelt v. Bradley Mlodzik | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: DANIEL J. BARTELT | |
| Represented By: | Daniel J. Bartelt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: BRADLEY MLODZIK | |
| Represented By: | Daniel J. O'Brien |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
