Logan Dyjak v. Corey Reed, et al
Plaintiff: LOGAN DYJAK
Defendant: COREY REED, HARVEY DANIELS, TRACEY RAWLINGS, JO-AN LYNN and KATE PATAROZZI
Case Number: 25-1653
Filed: April 17, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions-Cv Detainee
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER re: Motion for Extension of Time. A review of the docket shows that on September 24, 2025, briefing in this appeal was suspended pending resolution of the motion for appointment of counsel. Accordingly, the motion for extension of time is DENIED as unnecessary at this time. [ # 16 ] CDH [17] [7478509] [25-1653] (AD) [Entered: 10/02/2025 02:12 PM]
October 1, 2025 Filing 16 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak to extend time to file appellant's brief. [16] [7478281] [25-1653] (DAB) [Entered: 10/01/2025 03:44 PM]
September 24, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER: Briefing in this appeal is SUSPENDED pending resolution of the motion for appointment of counsel filed by the appellant on September 23, 2025. CDH [15] [7476925] [25-1653] (JMB) [Entered: 09/24/2025 02:20 PM]
September 23, 2025 Filing 14 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak for appointment of counsel. [14] [7476683] [25-1653] (DAB) [Entered: 09/23/2025 02:31 PM]
September 5, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellant's brief. [ # 12 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 09/29/2025 for Logan Dyjak. Appellees' brief due on or before 10/29/2025 for Harvey Daniels, Jo-an Lynn, Kate Patarozzi, Tracey Rawlings and Corey Reed. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 11/19/2025 for Appellant Logan Dyjak. CDH [13] [7472926] [25-1653] (CG) [Entered: 09/05/2025 02:31 PM]
September 4, 2025 Filing 12 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak to extend time to file appellant's brief. [12] [7472670] [25-1653] (NHV) [Entered: 09/04/2025 03:25 PM]
September 2, 2025 Filing 11 Filed Pro Se Appellant Show Cause Response by Appellant Logan Dyjak. [11][7471956] [25-1653] (DAB) [Entered: 09/02/2025 01:43 PM]
August 19, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER issued GRANTING Motion for Extension of Time. [ # 9 ] The Rule to Show Cause is SUSPENDED pending the timely filing of a brief by the appellant. Briefing shall proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 08/28/2025 for Logan Dyjak. Appellee's brief due on or before 09/29/2025 for Harvey Daniels, Jo-an Lynn, Kate Patarozzi, Tracey Rawlings and Corey Reed. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 10/20/2025 for Appellant Logan Dyjak. Failure to file a brief by this due date may result in the dismissal of this appeal for failure to prosecute. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 5270 1455 1988 13. [10] [7469631] [25-1653] (AD) [Entered: 08/19/2025 01:42 PM]
August 18, 2025 Filing 9 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak to extend time to file appellant's brief. [9] [7469481] [25-1653] (EF) [Entered: 08/18/2025 04:47 PM]
August 11, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: Appellant Logan Dyjak is directed to show cause as to why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to C. R. 31(c)(2). NV. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. Response to Rule to Show Cause due for Appellant Logan Dyjak by 08/25/2025. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589071052701455197076. [8] [7467932] [25-1653] (NHV) [Entered: 08/11/2025 10:58 AM]
July 1, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellant's brief. [ # 6 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 07/28/2025 for Logan Dyjak. Appellees' brief due on or before 08/27/2025 for Harvey Daniels, Jo-an Lynn, Kate Patarozzi, Tracey Rawlings and Corey Reed. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 09/17/2025 for Appellant Logan Dyjak. CDH [7] [7460522] [25-1653] (JMB) [Entered: 07/01/2025 11:54 AM]
June 30, 2025 Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak to extend time to file appellant's brief. [6] [7460336] [25-1653] (EF) [Entered: 06/30/2025 03:27 PM]
May 30, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellant's brief. [ # 4 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 06/27/2025 for Logan Dyjak. Appellees' brief due on or before 07/28/2025 for Harvey Daniels, Jo-an Lynn, Kate Patarozzi, Tracey Rawlings and Corey Reed. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 08/18/2025 for Appellant Logan Dyjak. SCR [5] [7455126] [25-1653] (JMB) [Entered: 05/30/2025 09:05 AM]
May 29, 2025 Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak to extend time to file appellant's brief. [4] [7454992] [25-1653] (CAH) [Entered: 05/29/2025 02:52 PM]
May 13, 2025 Filing 3 Appearance form filed by Attorney Mary C. LaBrec for Appellees Harvey Daniels, Jo-an Lynn, Kate Patarozzi, Tracey Rawlings and Corey Reed. Additional Parties: Lana Miller and Mark Estrop. [3] [7452038] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [25-1653] [3] [7452038] [25-1653]--[Edited 05/13/2025 by HTP to reflect termination and addition of counsel.] (LaBrec, Mary) [Entered: 05/13/2025 02:16 PM]
April 17, 2025 Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Lana Miller and Mark Estrop. [2] [7447547] [25-1653] (HTP) [Entered: 04/18/2025 10:09 AM]
April 17, 2025 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet filed. Appellant's brief due on or before 05/27/2025 for Logan Dyjak. [1] [7447546] [25-1653] (HTP) [Entered: 04/18/2025 10:04 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Logan Dyjak v. Corey Reed, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LOGAN DYJAK
Represented By: Logan Dyjak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COREY REED
Represented By: Mary C. LaBrec
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HARVEY DANIELS
Represented By: Mary C. LaBrec
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TRACEY RAWLINGS
Represented By: Mary C. LaBrec
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JO-AN LYNN
Represented By: Mary C. LaBrec
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KATE PATAROZZI
Represented By: Mary C. LaBrec
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?