Kevin Smith v. Officer Bennett, et al
| KEVIN E. SMITH |
| OFFICER BENNETT, LIEUTENANT HYATT and OFFICER MARTIN |
| 25-1788 |
| May 7, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Filed Response by Appellees Officer Bennett, Lieutenant Hyatt and Officer Martin Attorney Abigail R. Recker to Appellant's Jurisdictional Memorandum. [12][7479481] [25-1788] (Recker, Abigail) [Entered: 10/08/2025 08:52 AM] |
| Filing 11 Filed letter from Appellant Kevin E. Smith regarding jurisdictional memorandum filed 09/29/2025. [11] [7479083] [25-1788] (CAH) [Entered: 10/06/2025 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 10 Appearance form filed by Attorney Abigail Recker for Appellees Officer Bennett, Lieutenant Hyatt and Officer Martin. [10] [7478975] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [25-1788] [Edited 10/06/2025 by CG to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Recker, Abigail) [Entered: 10/06/2025 12:13 PM] |
Filing 9
ORDER re: Jurisdictional Memo. IT IS ORDERED that appellees shall file, on or before October 10, 2025, a response to appellants jurisdictional memorandum, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of September 3, 2025. JXK [9] [7477836] [25-1788] (AP) [Entered: 09/30/2025 10:31 AM]
|
| Filing 8 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Kevin E. Smith. [8] [7477713] [25-1788] (CAH) [Entered: 09/29/2025 04:30 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders appellant to show cause for his failure to respond to the court's order of September 3, 2025. Appellant shall file a response on or before October 10, 2025. Appellant is advised that failure to respond may result in the dismissal of this appeal. The clerk of this court shall attach a copy of the September 3, 2025, order to appellant's copy of this order. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 5270 1811 0025 49. JXK [7] [7477412] [25-1788] (PS) [Entered: 09/26/2025 02:54 PM]
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Appellant Kevin E. Smith shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7472148] JXK Jurisdictional memorandum due for Appellant Kevin E. Smith by 09/17/2025. [6] [7472148] [25-1788] (FP) [Entered: 09/03/2025 09:25 AM]
|
| Filing 5 ***PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT PARTIAL FILING FEE. Received: $21.36 from Appellant Kevin E. Smith on 09/02/2025. [5] [7471900] [25-1788] (CAH) [Entered: 09/02/2025 11:57 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Kevin E. Smith leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 07/08/2025. District Court has assessed a $21.36 initial partial filing fee. [4] [7461718] PLRA initial partial filing fee due by 08/08/2025. [25-1788] (CAH) [Entered: 07/08/2025 04:09 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. [3] [7455848] JR [25-1788] (CG) [Entered: 06/03/2025 02:41 PM]
|
| Filing 2 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Kevin E. Smith to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [2] [7455833] [25-1788] (DAB) [Entered: 06/03/2025 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing statement filed. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 06/06/2025. Transcript information sheet due by 05/21/2025. [1] [7451198] [25-1788] (CG) [Entered: 05/08/2025 12:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
