Charles Horn v. Housing Authority of Champaign County, et al
| CHARLES HORN, individually and as administrator on behalf of the ESTATE OF DONNA HORN |
| CHAMPAIGN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, NICOLE MELTON and DEBRA LEE |
| 25-2115 |
| July 1, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Mandate issued. No record to be returned. [17] [7479483] [25-2115] Date updated: 10/08/2025 (EF) [Entered: 10/08/2025 08:57 AM] |
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 09/16/2025 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7479488-2] [7479488] [25-2115] (EF) [Entered: 10/08/2025 09:24 AM] |
Filing 16
ORDER re: Appellant's motion to consolidate appeals. The motion to consolidate is DENIED. If appellant cannot pay the required fees for appeal No. 25-2633, he may file a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in that case. [ # 15 ] JXK [16] [7477571] [25-2115] (HTP) [Entered: 09/29/2025 11:42 AM]
|
| Filing 15 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Charles Horn to consolidate cases. [15] [7476371] [25-2115] (CAH) [Entered: 09/22/2025 03:21 PM] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER: On September 8, 2025, this court construed Charles Horns filings in this case as a petition for a writ of mandamus. In light of the district courts September 15, 2025, order denying Horns requests for a preliminary injunction, IT IS ORDERED that the construed petition for a writ of mandamus is DENIED. No further response to the petition is necessary. Under Rule 4(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, a notice of appeal filed after the court announces a decision or orderbut before the entry of the judgment or orderis treated as filed on the date of and after the entry. See FirsTier Mortg. Co. v. Invs. Mortg. Ins. Co., 498 U.S. 269, 276 (1991). The district court had not yet announced its decision on the motions for a preliminary injunction when Horn filed his notice of appeal, and so this notice of appeal is not effective to challenge the September 15 order. Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge; Michael Y. Scudder, Circuit Judge and Amy J. St. Eve, Circuit Judge. [14] [7475215] [25-2115] (AP) [Entered: 09/16/2025 02:46 PM]
|
| Filing 13 Filed notice from the District Court that the $605.00 appeal docketing fee was received. [13] [7475119] [25-2115] (CAH) [Entered: 09/16/2025 10:35 AM] |
| Filing 12 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Charles Horn leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 09/15/2025. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 10/15/2025 for Appellant Charles Horn. [7474887] [12] [7474887] [25-2115] (CG) [Entered: 09/15/2025 12:12 PM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER: On consideration of the papers filed in this appeal, this court construes appellant Charles Horns filings as a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking a ruling on his motions for injunctive relief filed on October 12, 2023, and February 14, 2025. Accordingly, Judge Colin S. Bruce is respectfully invited to respond to Horns petition on or before September 22, 2025. See Fed. R. Ap. P. 21(b)(4). JXK [11] [7473398] [25-2115] (CG) [Entered: 09/08/2025 02:48 PM]
|
| Filing 10 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Charles Horn for judicial notice, notification of ongoing violations, and request for enforcement of injunction. [10] [7468397] [25-2115] (EF) [Entered: 08/12/2025 01:12 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed Appellant Charles Horn Citation of Additional Authority, per Circuit Rule 28(e). [9] [7466269] [25-2115] (EF) [Entered: 07/31/2025 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 8 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellees Champaign County Housing Authority, Nicole Melton and Debra Lee. [8] [7465257] [25-2115] (Herman, Timothy) [Entered: 07/25/2025 09:42 PM] |
| Filing 7 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Charles Horn. Prior or Related proceedings: No. (Similar copy of #6). [7] [7464666] [25-2115] (CAH) [Entered: 07/23/2025 03:37 PM] |
| Filing 6 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Charles Horn. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [6] [7464602] [25-2115] (CAG) [Entered: 07/23/2025 01:52 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Appellant Charles Horn is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Charles Horn by 07/30/2025. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 5270 1455 1986 22. [5] [7463148] [25-2115] (AD) [Entered: 07/16/2025 08:47 AM]
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER re: Jurisdictional memorandum. IT IS ORDERED that appellees shall file, on or before July 25, 2025, a response to appellants jurisdictional memorandum, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of July 14, 2025. JXK [4] [7462899] [25-2115] (JMB) [Entered: 07/15/2025 09:32 AM]
|
| Filing 3 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Charles Horn. [3] [7462778] [25-2115] (CAH) [Entered: 07/14/2025 03:41 PM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Appellant shall file, on or before July 16, 2025, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal under Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure will satisfy this requirement. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) JXK [7460825] [2] [7460825] [25-2115] (JMB) [Entered: 07/02/2025 02:03 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Charles Horn by 07/07/2025. Transcript information sheet due by 07/15/2025. [1] [7460721] [25-2115] (JMB) [Entered: 07/02/2025 10:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
