Logan Dyjak v. Tracey Rawlings, et al
| LOGAN DYJAK |
| TRACEY RAWLINGS, COREY REED, JOSEPH SMITH, DAMION WALKER and SARA BROYLES |
| 25-2233 |
| July 22, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions-Cv Detainee |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellant's brief. [ # 13 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 02/03/2026 for Logan Dyjak. CDH [14] [7496869] [25-2233] (AD) [Entered: 01/07/2026 02:44 PM]
|
| Filing 13 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak to extend time to file appellant's brief. [13] [7496553] [25-2233] (EF) [Entered: 01/06/2026 03:34 PM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellant's brief. [ # 11 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 01/05/2026 for Logan Dyjak. CDH [12] [7490739] [25-2233] (AD) [Entered: 12/04/2025 11:31 AM]
|
| Filing 11 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak to extend time to file appellant's brief. [11] [7490565] [25-2233] (CAH) [Entered: 12/03/2025 03:00 PM] |
|
Filing 10
Order issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellant's brief. [ # 9 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 12/03/2025 for Logan Dyjak. CDH [10] [7484608] [25-2233] (AP) [Entered: 11/03/2025 12:41 PM]
|
| Filing 9 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak to extend time to file appellant's brief. [9] [7484415] [25-2233] (DAB) [Entered: 10/31/2025 04:08 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellant's brief. [ # 7 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 11/03/2025 for Logan Dyjak. CDH [8] [7478548] [25-2233] (AD) [Entered: 10/02/2025 03:09 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak to extend time to file appellant's brief. [7] [7478279] [25-2233] (DAB) [Entered: 10/01/2025 03:43 PM] |
|
Filing 6
Order issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellant's brief. [ # 5 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 10/02/2025 for Logan Dyjak. CDH [6] [7472663] [25-2233] (HTP) [Entered: 09/04/2025 03:11 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak to extend time to file appellant's brief. [5] [7472386] [25-2233] (DAB) [Entered: 09/03/2025 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [4] [7465608] [25-2233] (AD) [Entered: 07/29/2025 10:01 AM] |
| Filing 3 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [3] [7464440] (Note: The Office of the IL Attorney General has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [25-2233] (FP) [Entered: 07/23/2025 09:57 AM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Rebecca Wilson; Janelle Bruner; Sarah Kessinger; Deborah L/N/U; Harvey Daniels; Security Therapy Aide Tammy; Nicole Dipasquale; Kasturi Kripakaran; Eric Street; Erica Cooper; Mark Estrop; Trisha Parfitt; Kerstin Huffman; Kate Doe; Mary Doe; Surjit Singh; Kara Restango; Nicole Jones; Shaw L/N/U; Kylie Daley; Michael L/N/U; Carla L/N/U; Carly L/N/U; Tonya L/N/U; [2] [7464438] [25-2233] (FP) [Entered: 07/23/2025 09:55 AM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Transcript information sheet due by 08/05/2025. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Logan Dyjak by 07/29/2025. Appellant's brief due on or before 09/02/2025 for Logan Dyjak. [1] [7464430] [25-2233] (FP) [Entered: 07/23/2025 09:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
