Dylan Marshall v. City of Evansville, Indiana, et al
Plaintiff: DYLAN MARSHALL
Defendant: CITY OF EVANSVILLE, INDIANA, EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SAM SEDORIS, CAGE STREET, Officer and AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC.
Case Number: 25-2583
Filed: September 9, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER re: Motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. [ # 15 ] The motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED. Appellant Dylan Marshall has not made a potentially meritorious argument that the district court erred in denying her motion to reconsider. Marshall shall pay the required docketing fee within 14 days, or else this appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 5270 1455 1963 38. SCR [17] [7505567] [25-2583] (CG) [Entered: 02/18/2026 12:23 PM]
November 24, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER: On consideration of the papers filed in this appeal and review of the short record, this appeal is LIMITED to a review of the district courts August 7, 2025, order denying appellant's motion for reconsideration. Rule 4(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure requires that a notice of appeal in a civil case be filed in the district court within 30 days of the entry of the judgment or order appealed. In this case judgment was entered on May 5, 2025. Appellant moved for reconsideration on June 13, 2025. Because this motion was filed more than 28 days after the judgmenta deadline the district court could not extend, Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(2)it did not suspend the time to appeal the judgment. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4); Blue v. Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers Loc. Union 159, 676 F.3d 579, 584 (7th Cir. 2012). The notice of appeal was then filed on September 6, 2025, over three months late with respect to the judgment. The district court has not granted an extension of the appeal period, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and this court is not empowered to do so, see Fed. R. App. P. 26(b). This appeal is timely with respect to only the district courts August 7, 2025, order. Accordingly, this appeal, as LIMITED by this order, shall proceed to a ruling on appellants motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [16] [16] [7488862] [25-2583] (AD) [Entered: 11/24/2025 12:29 PM]
November 12, 2025 Filing 15 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Dylan Marshall to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [15] [7486620] [25-2583] (CAH) [Entered: 11/12/2025 03:23 PM]
October 16, 2025 Filing 14 Filed Response by Appellees American Medical Response, Inc., City of Evansville, Indiana, Evansville Police Department, Sam Sedoris and Cage Street Attorney Matthew S. Koressel to Joint Response to Appellant's Jurisdictional Memorandum. [14][7481216] [25-2583] (Koressel, Matthew) [Entered: 10/16/2025 02:20 PM]
October 8, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: The appellees shall file, on or before October 20, 2025, a response to appellants jurisdictional memorandum, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of September 10, 2025. [13] [7479599] [25-2583] (FP) [Entered: 10/08/2025 12:22 PM]
October 6, 2025 Filing 12 Filed Show Cause Response and Memorandum by Appellant Dylan Marshall. [12][7479116] [25-2583] (CAH) [Entered: 10/06/2025 03:42 PM]
October 6, 2025 Filing 11 Filed notice to the court regarding timeliness of filing and docketing statement by Appellant Dylan Marshall. [11] [7479115] [25-2583] (CAH) [Entered: 10/06/2025 03:40 PM]
October 3, 2025 Filing 10 ENTRY REMOVED AS ENTERED IN ERROR. [10] [7478699] [25-2583]--[Edited 10/03/2025 by FP;] (FP) [Entered: 10/03/2025 11:25 AM]
October 3, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders appellant to show cause for the failure to respond to the court's order of September 10, 2025. Appellant shall file a response on or before October 17, 2025. Appellant is advised that failure to respond may result in the dismissal of this appeal. The clerk of this court shall attach a copy of the September 10, 2025, order to appellant's copy of this order. JXK Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 5270 1455 1958 36. [9] [7478685] [25-2583] (FP) [Entered: 10/03/2025 11:01 AM]
October 2, 2025 Filing 8 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Dylan Marshall leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 10/02/2025. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 11/03/2025 for Appellant Dylan Marshall [7478453] [8] [7478453] [25-2583] (AP) [Entered: 10/02/2025 11:47 AM]
September 30, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER issued TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [7] [7477824] [25-2583] (CG) [Entered: 09/30/2025 10:17 AM]
September 29, 2025 Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Dylan Marshall to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [6] [7477735] [25-2583] (DAB) [Entered: 09/29/2025 04:40 PM]
September 23, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Appellant Dylan Marshall is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Dylan Marshall by 10/07/2025. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 5270 1455 1994 45. [5] [7476710] [25-2583] (AD) [Entered: 09/23/2025 03:14 PM]
September 10, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Appellant Dylan Marshall shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be LIMITED to review of the August 7, 2025 order denying the motion for reconsideration. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7473993] JXK Jurisdictional memorandum due for Appellant Dylan Marshall by 09/24/2025. [4] [7473993] [25-2583] (FP) [Entered: 09/10/2025 12:55 PM]
September 9, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7473844] JXK [3] [7473844] [25-2583] (FP) [Entered: 09/09/2025 04:24 PM]
September 9, 2025 Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Officer Christian; Stacy Steele; Brian Conner; P.D. McDonald. [2] [7473834] [25-2583] (FP) [Entered: 09/09/2025 04:05 PM]
September 9, 2025 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 09/23/2025. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Dylan Marshall by 09/15/2025. Fee or IFP forms due on 09/23/2025 for Appellant Dylan Marshall. [1] [7473828] [25-2583] (FP) [Entered: 09/09/2025 03:55 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Dylan Marshall v. City of Evansville, Indiana, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DYLAN MARSHALL
Represented By: Dylan Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF EVANSVILLE, INDIANA
Represented By: Matthew Koressel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Represented By: Matthew Koressel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAM SEDORIS
Represented By: Matthew Koressel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CAGE STREET, Officer
Represented By: Matthew Koressel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC.
Represented By: James F. Bleeke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?