Logan Dyjak v. Harvey Daniels, et al
| LOGAN DYJAK |
| HARVEY DANIELS, Clinical Nurse Manager, JO-AN LYNN, Clinical Director and STACEY HORSTMAN |
| 25-2694 |
| September 25, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions-Cv Detainee |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER re: Motion to supplement response to order to show cause. In light of the courts order dated February 25, 2026, the appellants motion will be filed without further court action. CDH [11] [7508842] [25-2694] (HTP) [Entered: 03/04/2026 12:23 PM]
|
| Filing 10 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak to supplement response to order to show cause. [10] [7508602] [25-2694] (EF) [Entered: 03/03/2026 02:54 PM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER re: Response to order to show cause. The Rule to Show Cause is SUSPENDED pending the timely filing of a brief by the party(s). Briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 03/27/2026 for Logan Dyjak. Appellee's brief due on or before 04/27/2026 for Harvey Daniels, Stacey Horstman and Jo-an Lynn. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 05/18/2026 for Appellant Logan Dyjak. Failure to file a brief by this due date may result in the dismissal of this appeal for failure to prosecute. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 5270 1810 9550 37. CDH [9] [7507251] [25-2694] (CG) [Entered: 02/25/2026 10:46 AM]
|
| Filing 8 Filed Show Cause Response by Appellant Logan Dyjak to show cause order. [8][7507094] [25-2694] (CAG) [Entered: 02/24/2026 03:04 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Appellant Logan Dyjak is directed to show cause as to why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to C. R. 31(c)(2). GW. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. Response to Rule to Show Cause due for Appellant Logan Dyjak by 02/24/2026. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589071052702984956790. [7] [7503857] [25-2694] (GW) [Entered: 02/10/2026 12:54 PM]
|
|
Filing 6
Order issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellant's brief. [ # 5 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 01/26/2026 for Logan Dyjak. Appellees' brief due on or before 02/25/2026 for Harvey Daniels, Stacey Horstman and Jo-an Lynn. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 03/18/2026 for Appellant Logan Dyjak. CDH [6] [7495901] [25-2694] (HTP) [Entered: 01/05/2026 08:59 AM]
|
| Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Logan Dyjak to extend time to file appellant's brief. [5] [7495756] [25-2694] (CAG) [Entered: 12/31/2025 01:30 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: This court received notice from the District Court that the appellant paid the required docketing fee. Briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 12/26/2025 for Logan Dyjak. Appellee's brief due on or before 01/26/2026 for Harvey Daniels, Stacey Horstman and Jo-an Lynn. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 02/17/2026 for Appellant Logan Dyjak [4] [7489127] [25-2694] (CAH) [Entered: 11/25/2025 11:21 AM]
|
| Filing 3 Appearance form filed by Attorney Samantha Cutler for Appellees Harvey Daniels, Jo-an Lynn and Stacey Horstman. [3] [7480372] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [25-2694] [3] [7480372] [25-2694]--[Edited 10/14/2025 by HTP to reflect termination and addition of counsel.] (Cutler, Samantha) [Entered: 10/14/2025 11:16 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed notice from the District Court that the appeal docketing fee was received. [2] [7477793] [25-2694] (DAB) [Entered: 09/30/2025 09:09 AM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 10/09/2025. Fee or IFP forms due on 10/09/2025 for Appellant Logan Dyjak. [1] [7477123] [25-2694] (CG) [Entered: 09/25/2025 11:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
