Adam Raney v. Tonia Moon, et al
Plaintiff: ADAM RANEY
Defendant: TONIA MOON, RANDALL HEPP and JASON BENZEL, Warden
Case Number: 25-2695
Filed: September 25, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 28, 2026 Adam Raney v Tonia Moon

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER re: Request to supplement appeal with newly acquired jurisdictional information. The motion and attachments shall be taken with the case for resolution by the assigned merits panel. VXK [23] [7505601] [25-2695] (HTP) [Entered: 02/18/2026 02:24 PM]
February 17, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER re: Motion to supplement plaintiff's appeal. The clerk of this court shall distribute this motion to the merits panel alongside the brief. VXK [22] [7505300] [25-2695] (CG) [Entered: 02/17/2026 03:58 PM]
February 11, 2026 Filing 21 Pro se request filed by Appellant Adam Raney to supplement appeal with newly acquired jurisdictional information. [21] [7504234] [25-2695] (EF) [Entered: 02/11/2026 02:47 PM]
February 4, 2026 Filing 20 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Adam Raney to supplement appeal. (Forwarded from the District Court) [20] [7502644] [25-2695] (PS) [Entered: 02/04/2026 02:48 PM]
January 8, 2026 Filing 19 Filed letter from Appellant Adam Raney. [19] [7497212] [25-2695] (EF) [Entered: 01/08/2026 04:04 PM]
December 23, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER: The jurisdictional issue identified in this courts October 30, 2025, order is TAKEN WITH THE CASE for resolution by the merits panel. Because briefing in this case is complete, the case will be submitted for decision as soon as this courts docket permits. JXK [18] [7494667] [25-2695] (PS) [Entered: 12/23/2025 09:55 AM]
November 14, 2025 Filing 17 Filed Response by Appellant Adam Raney to 10/03/2025 order. [17][7487211] [25-2695] (CAH) [Entered: 11/14/2025 02:54 PM]
November 10, 2025 Filing 16 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Adam Raney. [16] [7486307] [25-2695] (DAB) [Entered: 11/10/2025 04:09 PM]
October 31, 2025 Filing 15 1 copy amended appellant's brief filed by Appellant Adam Raney, per order. [15] [7484544] [25-2695] (EF) [Entered: 11/03/2025 10:58 AM]
October 31, 2025 Filing 14 INSTANTER ORDER: On October 29, 2025, the clerk received a second opening brief from the appellant, which the court will construe as an implied request for leave to file an amended brief. Construed as such, the request is GRANTED. The clerk shall file INSTANTER the brief received by the clerk on October 29, 2025. This brief replaces the brief previously filed on September 30, 2025. Briefing in this appeal remains suspended in accordance with the courts order dated October 30, 2025. CDH [14] [7484320] [25-2695] (AD) [Entered: 10/31/2025 12:25 PM]
October 30, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: Appellant shall file, on or before November 13, 2025, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or LIMITED to review of the September 17, 2025, order denying appellants amended motion for reconsideration. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7484164] JXK [13] [7484164] [25-2695] (AP) [Entered: 10/30/2025 03:22 PM]
October 29, 2025 Filing 12 ***PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT PARTIAL FILING FEE. Received: $2.28 from Appellant Adam Raney on 10/29/2025. [12] [7483899] [25-2695] (CAH) [Entered: 10/29/2025 03:01 PM]
October 21, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER re: Letter. This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings will remain suspended until the appellants fee status has been resolved. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket shows that on October 17, 2025, the district court granted the appellants motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and assessed a $2.28 initial partial filing fee which has yet to be paid. The clerk will send the appellant a copy of the courts public docket. [11] [7482086] CDH [25-2695] (AP) [Entered: 10/21/2025 02:47 PM]
October 21, 2025 Filing 10 Filed letter from Appellant Adam Raney. Forwarded from the District Court. [10] [7481949] [25-2695] (AP) [Entered: 10/21/2025 10:10 AM]
October 17, 2025 Filing 9 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Adam Raney leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 10/17/2025. District Court has assessed a $2.28 initial partial filing fee. [9] [7481369] PLRA initial partial filing fee due by 11/17/2025. [25-2695] (DAB) [Entered: 10/17/2025 11:57 AM]
October 8, 2025 Filing 8 Filed letter from Appellant Adam Raney regarding delays in receiving mail. [8] [7479651] [25-2695] (NHV) [Entered: 10/08/2025 03:09 PM]
October 8, 2025 Filing 7 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Adam Raney. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [7] [7479650] [25-2695] (NHV) [Entered: 10/08/2025 03:06 PM]
October 3, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER re: Letter regarding IFP papers and "appeal from the District Court." The appellant requests in his letter that the court disregard the appeal. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) allows an appellant to voluntarily dismiss his appeal. However, the appellant is reminded that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore the filing of a notice of appeal triggers the obligation to pay the appropriate filing fees and voluntary dismissal does not relieve the appellant of the obligation to pay the appellate filing fees. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b). Further, once the appeal is dismissed, the appellant cannot reinstate it at a later date. Because it is unclear whether the appellant seeks to unconditionally dismiss this appeal, the motion is DENIED without prejudice to renewal. Should the appellant decide that he does not want to proceed with this appeal, he may file a renewed motion that complies with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). Any renewed motion is due by November 3, 2025. CDH [6] [7478733] CDH [25-2695] (CG) [Entered: 10/03/2025 12:48 PM]
October 2, 2025 Filing 5 Filed letter dated 10/1/2025 from Appellant Adam Raney regarding IFP papers and "appeal from the District Court." (Document forwarded from the District Court.) [5] [7478541] [25-2695] (JR) [Entered: 10/02/2025 02:58 PM]
October 2, 2025 Filing 4 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis was filed on 9/29/2025 and is currently pending. [4] [7478536] [25-2695] (JR) [Entered: 10/02/2025 02:55 PM]
September 30, 2025 Filing 3 1 copy Appellant's brief filed by Appellant Adam Raney (Forwarded from the District Court). [3] [7477884] [25-2695]--[Edited 10/31/2025 by AD] REPLACED, per the 10.31.2025 order of the court. (DAB) [Entered: 09/30/2025 11:40 AM]
September 25, 2025 Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7477199] (Note: The Office of the WI Attorney General has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [25-2695] (JMB) [Entered: 09/25/2025 03:15 PM]
September 25, 2025 Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Adam Raney by 10/02/2025. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 10/27/2025. Transcript information sheet due by 10/09/2025. [1] [7477196] [25-2695] (JMB) [Entered: 09/25/2025 03:10 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Adam Raney v. Tonia Moon, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ADAM RANEY
Represented By: Adam Raney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TONIA MOON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RANDALL HEPP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JASON BENZEL, Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?