Christopher Goodvine v. Bradley Mlodzik, et al
| CHRISTOPHER GOODVINE |
| BRADLEY MLODZIK, JILL WENZEL, JACOB GRIPENTROG, NURSE CHAD and C. SCHMUDE |
| 25-2747 |
| October 2, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER re: Motion to dismiss. The motion is DENIED without prejudice to renewal. Should the appellant decide that he does not want to proceed with this appeal, he may file a renewed motion that complies with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). Any such motion is due by March 5, 2026. If the appellant does wish to proceed with this appeal, he must either pay the $605.00 appellate filing fees or file a renewed motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the district court by March 5, 2026. [ # 11 ] [12] [7502404] CDH [25-2747] (AP) [Entered: 02/03/2026 03:35 PM]
|
| Filing 11 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Christopher Goodvine to dismiss case. [11] [7502135] [25-2747] (DAB) [Entered: 02/02/2026 04:50 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed district court order dated 01/14/2026, Plaintiff's motion for leave to appeal without prepaying appellate filing fee DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. [10] [7498422] [25-2747][10] [7498422] [25-2747]-[Edited by CAG on 02/03/2026 to reflect correct order] (CAG) [Entered: 01/14/2026 01:44 PM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER re: Motion for mandamus or other writ, and motion for order directing the district court to screen plaintiffs complaint and treat motions to proceed. [ # 8 ] This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the courts docket shows that appellants motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis remains pending before the district court. Accordingly, any relief requested in the appellants motion is DENIED without court action, pursuant to this courts fee notice and order dated October 2, 2025. CDH [9] [7496574] [25-2747] (PS) [Entered: 01/06/2026 03:54 PM]
|
| Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Christopher Goodvine for mandamus or other writ and motion for order directing District Court to screen Plaintiff's complaint and treat motions to proceed. [8] [7496154] [25-2747] (CAH) [Entered: 01/05/2026 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 7 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [7] [7489510] [25-2747] (DAB) [Entered: 11/26/2025 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 6 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Christopher Goodvine. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [6] [7483453] [25-2747] (NHV) [Entered: 10/28/2025 09:40 AM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER re: Plaintiff's motion to moot appeal taken in this matter in lieu of indicative ruling alternatively, the court should construe this as a motion allowed under Rule 4(a)(4) Fed. R. App. Proc. On October 2, 2025, the appellant filed a document in the district court titled, Plaintiffs motion for permission to take an interlocutory appeal and notice of intent to appeal effective denial of motion for injunctive relief, which the district court treated as a notice of appeal. This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, any relief requested in the appellants motion is DENIED without court action, pursuant to the courts fee notice and order dated October 2, 2025. It is unclear if the appellant seeks to dismiss his appeal. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) allows an appellant to voluntarily dismiss his appeal. However, the filing of a notice of appeal triggers the obligation to pay the appropriate filing fees and voluntary dismissal does not relieve the appellant of the obligation to pay the appellate filing fees. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b). Further, once the appeal is dismissed, the appellant cannot reinstate it at a later date. Should the appellant decide that he does not want to proceed with this appeal, he may file a renewed motion that complies with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). Any such motion is due by October 30, 2025. If the appellant does wish to proceed with this appeal, he must either pay the $605.00 appellate filing fees or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the district court by November 3, 2025. [ # 4 ] [5] [7481339] CDH [25-2747] (HTP) [Entered: 10/17/2025 10:59 AM]
|
| Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Christopher Goodvine to moot appeal in lieu of indicative ruling or alternatively, construe this motion under Rule 4(a)(4). Forwarded from the District Court. [4] [7480734] [25-2747] (AP) [Entered: 10/15/2025 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 3 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Krause, Beck, Kirst, CO Pesh, CO Schetter, CO Dominguez, CO Lamas, CO Linden, CO Williams, CO Jetter, CO Jopp, CO Phelps, CO Ayuk, CO Mitchel, CO Jato, CO Finn, CO Miller, and CO Peterson. [3] [7478768] [25-2747] (HTP) [Entered: 10/03/2025 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7478766] [25-2747] (HTP) [Entered: 10/03/2025 02:31 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Christopher Goodvine by 10/09/2025. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 11/03/2025. Transcript information sheet due by 10/16/2025. [1] [7478759] [25-2747] (HTP) [Entered: 10/03/2025 02:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
