Fadeel Shuhaiber v. Randy Pfister, et al
Plaintiff: FADEEL SHUHAIBER
Defendant: RANDY PFISTER, GEORGE ADAMSON and WALTER NICHOLSON, Warden
Case Number: 25-2927
Filed: October 28, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2026 Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Fadeel Shuhaiber to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [8] [7508941] [25-2927] (DAB) [Entered: 03/04/2026 03:47 PM]
February 11, 2026 Filing 7 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Fadeel Shuhaiber leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 02/11/2026. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 03/13/2026 for Appellant Fadeel Shuhaiber [7504097] [7] [7504097] [25-2927] (AP) [Entered: 02/11/2026 10:43 AM]
January 28, 2026 Filing 6 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [6] [7501060] [25-2927] (AP) [Entered: 01/28/2026 12:24 PM]
January 14, 2026 Filing 5 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Fadeel Shuhaiber leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 01/13/2025. Plaintiff's renewed application for leave to appeal in forma pauperis is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff has not complied with the Court's 12/4/25 order [184], which required him to either prepay the $605.00 appellate filing fee or submit a properly completed in forma pauperis affidavit that reflects his current means of support. Plaintiff has answered "n/a" (presumably, not applicable) to all questions concerning income received in the past twelve months from any of a number of sources. The answer remains improper. Plaintiff, who now resides in Dubai, is not in custody, and although he states that he is permanently disabled, it is not plausible that he is subsisting without any means of support. Plaintiff also has not listed his issues on appeal, as the Court directed him to do in its prior order. As the Court previously instructed Plaintiff, the required financial affidavit can be found at https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/assets/pdf/pauperis.pdf. Plaintiff's failure to satisfy the appellate filing fee requirements by 2/6/26 may result in dismissal of his appeal by the Seventh Circuit. [7498222] [5] [7498222] [25-2927] (CG) [Entered: 01/14/2026 08:55 AM]
December 4, 2025 Filing 4 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Fadeel Shuhaiber leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff now resides in Dubai and acknowledges that his financial circumstances have changed since he filed this lawsuit. Although he indicates that he has not been employed since 2022, he has not attached an in forma pauperis application, though he claims that he did. If Plaintiff wants to proceed on appeal without prepayment of the appellate filing fees, he must provide an updated in forma pauperis affidavit that reflects his current means of support and any assets. Plaintiff also must list his issues on appeal, as his current motion fails to do so. Plaintiff can find the required affidavit at https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/assets/pdf/pauperis.p df. If Plaintiff fails to submit a properly completed affidavit or fails to prepay the $605.00 appellate filing fee by 1/9/26, the Seventh Circuit may dismiss this appeal. [4] [7490832] [25-2927] (AP) [Entered: 12/04/2025 02:58 PM]
December 1, 2025 Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Fadeel Shuhaiber. Prior or Related proceedings: No. (Note Copy forwarded from District Court.) [3] [7489960] [25-2927] (JR) [Entered: 12/01/2025 04:58 PM]
November 17, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Appellant Fadeel Shuhaiber is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Fadeel Shuhaiber by 12/01/2025. [2] [7487444] [25-2927] (HTP) [Entered: 11/17/2025 12:24 PM]
October 28, 2025 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Transcript information sheet due by 11/12/2025. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Fadeel Shuhaiber by 10/31/2025. [1] [7483842] [25-2927] (FP) [Entered: 10/29/2025 12:11 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Fadeel Shuhaiber v. Randy Pfister, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FADEEL SHUHAIBER
Represented By: Fadeel Shuhaiber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RANDY PFISTER
Represented By: Frank Henry Bieszczat
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GEORGE ADAMSON
Represented By: Frank Henry Bieszczat
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WALTER NICHOLSON, Warden
Represented By: Frank Henry Bieszczat
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?