Nirin Walls v. Ms. Gardner
Plaintiff: NIRIN A. WALLS
Defendant: TAWANDA SHACK, MR. GRAYSON, LIEUTENANT ROLDAN, MR. CRUZ, MS. BARNES and MS. GARDNER
Case Number: 25-2958
Filed: October 31, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER re: Motion. This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket indicates that the appellants fee status has not yet been determined. Specifically, the appellants motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is currently pending before this court. Accordingly, to the extent that the appellant seeks recruitment of counsel, request is DENIED without court action, pursuant to this courts fee notice and order dated October 31, 2025. To the extent that the appellant seeks copies of record items, that request should be made in the district court. [ # 14 ] [15] [7516193] CDH [25-2958] (HTP) [Entered: 04/08/2026 09:58 AM]
April 7, 2026 Filing 14 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Nirin A. Walls for appointment of counsel. [14] [7516096] [25-2958] (NHV) [Entered: 04/07/2026 03:29 PM]
March 27, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: A review of the docket shows that the appellant has not filed a Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement. Accordingly, the appellant shall file his docketing statement by April 10, 2026. The clerk shall send the appellant this courts instructions for preparing a docketing statement. In his docketing statement, the appellant should attempt to provide the information listed in the Pro Se Instructions, particularly the date of the district court judgment or order being challenged in this appeal. [13] [7513645] CDH [25-2958] (FP) [Entered: 03/27/2026 01:27 PM]
March 26, 2026 Filing 12 Filed Appellant Nirin A. Walls Memorandum In Support of PLRA Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis. [12] [7513510] [25-2958] (NHV) [Entered: 03/26/2026 04:42 PM]
March 26, 2026 Filing 11 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Nirin A. Walls to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [11] [7513508] [25-2958] (NHV) [Entered: 03/26/2026 04:41 PM]
March 11, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: On March 9, 2026, the appellant filed a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, which the court will construe as an implied request to recall the mandate. Construed as such, the request to recall the mandate is GRANTED. The final order dated January 23, 2026, is VACATED, the mandate is RECALLED, and this appeal is REINSTATED. To the extent that the appellant seeks to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, his paperwork is incomplete because it does not include the required PLRA memorandum. Accordingly, the appellant shall file the required PLRA memorandum by April 10, 2026. In his memorandum, the appellant should explain why he believes the district courts denial of leave to appeal in forma pauperis was erroneous. Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this appeal. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 05270 1810 9551 43. CDH [10] [7510292] [25-2958] (CG) [Entered: 03/11/2026 02:51 PM]
March 11, 2026 FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 03/11/2026 Order Vacating Dismissal/Recalling Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7510306-2] [7510306] [25-2958] (CG) [Entered: 03/11/2026 03:12 PM]
March 9, 2026 Filing 9 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Nirin A. Walls to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. (Forwarded from the District Court). [9] [7509665] [25-2958] (CAG) [Entered: 03/09/2026 02:13 PM]
February 5, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Re: Motion for Cause In Regards to January 23, 2026 Order, which the court construes as a motion to recall the mandate. On October 27, 2025, appellant filed a document in the district court titled Notice of Appeal. The appellant is reminded that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore the filing of a notice of appeal triggers the obligation to pay the appropriate filing fees and voluntary dismissal does not relieve the appellant of the obligation to pay the appellate filing fees. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b). Accordingly, the request to recall the mandate is DENIED without prejudice to renewal in a motion that includes either confirmation that the appellant paid the $605.00 appellate filings fees in the district court or a tendered motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis together with a PLRA memorandum in support. Any renewed motion is due by March 9, 2026. [ # 7 ] [8] [7502821] CDH [25-2958] (AD) [Entered: 02/05/2026 10:48 AM]
February 4, 2026 Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Nirin A. Walls for Cause In Regards to January 23, 2026 Order. [7] [7502820] [25-2958] (AD) [Entered: 02/05/2026 10:45 AM]
January 23, 2026 Filing 6 IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED for failure to pay the required docketing fee pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). The appellant shall remit to the clerk of the district court the $605 appellate fees. Mandate issued, no record to be returned. The pro se appellant was DENIED leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis by the district court on 11/04/2025. The pro se appellant has neither paid the $605 appellate fees nor filed a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the appellate court. [6][7500152] [25-2958] (CAG) [Entered: 01/23/2026 10:19 AM]
January 23, 2026 FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 01/23/2026 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7500159-2] [7500159] [25-2958] (CAG) [Entered: 01/23/2026 10:27 AM]
November 13, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER re: Motion requesting extension of time, filed on 11/10/2025. This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket indicates that the appellants fee status has not yet been determined. Specifically, on November 4, 2025, the district court denied the appellants motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED to the extent that the appellant shall either pay the $605.00 appellate filing fees in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, PLRA memorandum in support, and trust fund account statement with the clerk of this court by December 19, 2025. In his memorandum, the appellant should explain why he believes the district courts denial of leave to appeal in forma pauperis was erroneous. Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this appeal. Further, the appellants overdue Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement and any transcript information sheet are due by December 1, 2025. The clerk will send the appellant an asset affidavit and transcript information sheet form. Finally, the clerk will modify the docket to reflect that Defendant Gardner is the only appellee in this matter. [ # 4 ] Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 5270 1607 0375. [5] [7486855] CDH [25-2958] (FP) [Entered: 11/13/2025 01:15 PM]
November 10, 2025 Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Nirin A. Walls to extend time to file. [4] [7486264] [25-2958] (EF) [Entered: 11/10/2025 03:41 PM]
November 5, 2025 Filing 3 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Nirin A. Walls leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 11/04/2025. [3] [7485337] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 12/05/2025. [25-2958] (DAB) [Entered: 11/05/2025 12:34 PM]
October 31, 2025 Filing 2 No attorney(s) added for Appellees Mr. Cruz, Mr. Grayson, Lieutenant Roldan and Tawanda Shack, per District Court docket. [2] [7484388] [25-2958] (HTP) [Entered: 10/31/2025 03:31 PM]
October 31, 2025 Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Nirin A. Walls by 11/03/2025. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 12/01/2025. Transcript information sheet due by 11/14/2025. [1] [7484383] [25-2958] (HTP) [Entered: 10/31/2025 03:24 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Nirin Walls v. Ms. Gardner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NIRIN A. WALLS
Represented By: Nirin A. Walls
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TAWANDA SHACK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MR. GRAYSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LIEUTENANT ROLDAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MR. CRUZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MS. BARNES
Represented By: Frank Henry Bieszczat
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MS. GARDNER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?