William Maxwell v. James R. Sweeney II, et al
| WILLIAM C. MAXWELL |
| JAMES R. SWEENEY, II and TIM A. BAKER |
| DAKOTA MICHAEL and CHELSEY SMITH |
| 25-3139 |
| December 1, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Notice of $600.00 fee payment. Receipt #00141. [5] [7491828] [25-3139] (CAH) [Entered: 12/09/2025 04:05 PM] |
Filing 4
ORDER re: 1) Petition of William C. Maxwell for a Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. 2) Emergency Motion for Immediate Stay Pending Review. 3) Motion for Leave to File Electronically. The petition for writ of mandamus and motion to stay pending review are DENIED. Further, the motion for leave to file electronically is DENIED as unnecessary. Diane S. Sykes, Circuit Judge; Candace Jackson-Akiwumi, Circuit Judge and John Z. Lee, Circuit Judge. [ # 2 ] [ # 3 ] [4] [7489992] [25-3139] (AD) [Entered: 12/02/2025 08:51 AM]
|
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 12/02/2025 Mandamus Final Order sent to the District Court Clerk. [7490010-2] [7490010] [25-3139] (AD) [Entered: 12/02/2025 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 3 Pro se motion filed by Petitioner William C. Maxwell for leave to file electronically. [3] [7489784] [25-3139] (JR) [Entered: 12/01/2025 01:18 PM] |
| Filing 2 Emergency motion filed by Petitioner William C. Maxwell for immediate stay pending review. [2] [7489669] [25-3139] (PS) [Entered: 12/01/2025 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed. Fee due. Fee or IFP forms due on 12/15/2025 for Petitioner William C. Maxwell. [1] [7489658] [25-3139] (PS) [Entered: 12/01/2025 10:08 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
