Travis Burke v. Renea Saltsgaver, et al
| TRAVIS BURKE |
| RENEA SALTSGAVER, ALINE NELSON, JOSH SAPP, OLGA VISHINAKOV and SARA STOVER |
| 25-3184 |
| December 3, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER re: Motion for permission to appeal in forma pauperis. [ # 10 ] The request for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED. The appellant has not made a potentially meritorious argument that the district court erred in dismissing his case. Appellant shall pay the required docketing fee within 14 days, or else this appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 5270 1810 9556 48. CLH [11] [7527729] [25-3184] (PS) [Entered: 05/22/2026 09:52 AM]
|
| Filing 10 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Travis Burke to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [10] [7500762] [25-3184] (EF) [Entered: 01/27/2026 01:45 PM] |
| Filing 9 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Travis Burke. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [9] [7500760] [25-3184] (EF) [Entered: 01/27/2026 01:43 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed notice of change of address for Travis P. Burke. [8] [7500593] [25-3184] (EF) [Entered: 01/26/2026 03:53 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Appellant Travis Burke is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. AD. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Travis Burke by 01/29/2026. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9589 0710 5270 0423 8790 68. [7] [7498550] [25-3184] (AD) [Entered: 01/15/2026 09:32 AM]
|
| Filing 6 Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 14 day notice to file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or pay the docketing fee in the District Court. Fee or IFP forms due on 01/28/2026 for Appellant Travis Burke. [6] [7498505] [25-3184] (AD) [Entered: 01/14/2026 03:59 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Appellant Travis Burke is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. AD. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Travis Burke by 01/02/2026. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 9598 0710 5270 1455 1999 40. [5] [7493853] [25-3184] (AD) [Entered: 12/18/2025 11:45 AM]
|
| Filing 4 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Travis Burke leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 12/04/2025. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 01/05/2026 for Appellant Travis Burke [7490907] [4] [7490907] [25-3184] (CG) [Entered: 12/04/2025 04:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: R. Synder, Correctional Officer Borden, Correctional Officer McMahon, Dustin Heuerman, Champaign County Physical Plant, and Correctional Officer Johnson. [3] [7490794] [25-3184] (HTP) [Entered: 12/04/2025 12:52 PM] |
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7490792] [25-3184] (HTP) [Entered: 12/04/2025 12:47 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Travis Burke by 12/10/2025. Transcript information sheet due by 12/17/2025. [1] [7490790] [25-3184] (HTP) [Entered: 12/04/2025 12:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
