Steven Brownell v. Michael Rivers, et al
| STEVEN A. BROWNELL |
| MICHAEL RIVERS, JASON BENZEL, Warden, DAISY CHASE, SANDRA DEYOUNG and JARED HOY |
| 25-3240 |
| December 12, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER re: Motion for voluntary dismissal of appeal. This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42(b). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [ # 3 ][4][7495253] [25-3240] (CG) [Entered: 12/29/2025 04:01 PM]
|
| Filing 3 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Steven A. Brownell to dismiss case pursuant to FRAP 42(b). [3] [7495072] [25-3240] (CAG) [Entered: 12/29/2025 10:06 AM] |
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7495259-2] [7495259] [25-3240] (CG) [Entered: 12/29/2025 04:08 PM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Appellant shall file, on or before December 30, 2025, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal under Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure will satisfy this requirement. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7493205] JXK [2] [7493205] [25-3240] (AP) [Entered: 12/16/2025 10:06 AM]
|
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Transcript information sheet due by 12/26/2025. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Steven A. Brownell by 12/17/2025. Appellant's brief due on or before 01/21/2026 for Steven A. Brownell. [1] [7493027] [25-3240] (FP) [Entered: 12/15/2025 03:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
